IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Ltru] Re: Remove extlang from ABNF?

"Frank Ellermann" <nobody@xyzzy.claranet.de> Tue, 04 December 2007 23:15 UTC

Return-path: <ltru-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Izgyz-0004mN-Ex; Tue, 04 Dec 2007 18:15:17 -0500
Received: from ltru by megatron.ietf.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1Izgyy-0004m6-KW for ltru-confirm+ok@megatron.ietf.org; Tue, 04 Dec 2007 18:15:16 -0500
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Izgyw-0004la-4N for ltru@lists.ietf.org; Tue, 04 Dec 2007 18:15:16 -0500
Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.229.2] helo=ciao.gmane.org) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Izgyu-0005OS-Rl for ltru@lists.ietf.org; Tue, 04 Dec 2007 18:15:14 -0500
Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1Izgyk-0006TL-Ro for ltru@lists.ietf.org; Tue, 04 Dec 2007 23:15:02 +0000
Received: from c-180-160-165.hh.dial.de.ignite.net ([62.180.160.165]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for <ltru@lists.ietf.org>; Tue, 04 Dec 2007 23:15:02 +0000
Received: from nobody by c-180-160-165.hh.dial.de.ignite.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for <ltru@lists.ietf.org>; Tue, 04 Dec 2007 23:15:02 +0000
X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/
To: ltru@lists.ietf.org
From: Frank Ellermann <nobody@xyzzy.claranet.de>
Date: Wed, 05 Dec 2007 00:16:58 +0100
Organization: <http://purl.net/xyzzy>
Lines: 14
Message-ID: <fj4n17$ju7$1@ger.gmane.org>
References: <20071204112939.GA13475@nic.fr> <fj3lel$isq$1@ger.gmane.org><20071204164508.GA24641@nic.fr><C9BF0238EED3634BA1866AEF14C7A9E55DFC390EC2@NA-EXMSG-C116.redmond.corp.microsoft.com><20071204193040.GG15972@mercury.ccil.org> <C9BF0238EED3634BA1866AEF14C7A9E55DFC390F4D@NA-EXMSG-C116.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: c-180-160-165.hh.dial.de.ignite.net
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1914
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1914
X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 08170828343bcf1325e4a0fb4584481c
Cc:
Subject: [Ltru] Re: Remove extlang from ABNF?
X-BeenThere: ltru@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Frank Ellermann <hmdmhdfmhdjmzdtjmzdtzktdkztdjz@gmail.com>
List-Id: Language Tag Registry Update working group discussion list <ltru.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru>, <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/ltru>
List-Post: <mailto:ltru@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru>, <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: ltru-bounces@ietf.org

Shawn Steele wrote:

> if moving away from extlang, there should be an effort to
> reeducate these people :)

The idea was that 4646 implementations can deal with whatever
happens in 4646bis wrt extlang-s, and "3" was identified as
worst case.  "1" was what I hoped for 4646bis, "0" is better.

Updating Wikipedia isn't our job - just a few days ago I've
updated the "frs" and "gsw" articles, IIRC "frs" still had
an old SIL code.  
 
 Frank



_______________________________________________
Ltru mailing list
Ltru@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email