Re: [Ltru] Good news: draft-ietf-ltru-matching approved by the IESG

Ted Hardie <hardie@qualcomm.com> Sun, 09 July 2006 11:42 UTC

Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FzXgI-0003hO-10; Sun, 09 Jul 2006 07:42:34 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FzXgG-0003hJ-PS for ltru@ietf.org; Sun, 09 Jul 2006 07:42:32 -0400
Received: from stsc1260-eth-s1-s1p1-vip.va.neustar.com ([156.154.16.129] helo=chiedprmail1.ietf.org) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FzXgG-0000ti-O0 for ltru@ietf.org; Sun, 09 Jul 2006 07:42:32 -0400
Received: from ithilien.qualcomm.com ([129.46.51.59]) by chiedprmail1.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FzXgE-000635-AH for ltru@ietf.org; Sun, 09 Jul 2006 07:42:32 -0400
Received: from sabrina.qualcomm.com (sabrina.qualcomm.com [129.46.61.150]) by ithilien.qualcomm.com (8.13.6/8.12.5/1.0) with ESMTP id k69BgNwO006861 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Sun, 9 Jul 2006 04:42:24 -0700
Received: from [10.1.242.250] (vpn-10-50-16-24.qualcomm.com [10.50.16.24]) by sabrina.qualcomm.com (8.13.6/8.13.6/1.0) with ESMTP id k69BgLuC002912; Sun, 9 Jul 2006 04:42:22 -0700 (PDT)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <p06230902c0d69b004eab@[10.1.242.250]>
In-Reply-To: <6.0.0.20.2.20060708141213.080016f0@localhost>
References: <6.0.0.20.2.20060707211933.07869b40@localhost> <30b660a20607070827g88c9daak2048987e087a3530@mail.gmail.com> <6.0.0.20.2.20060708141213.080016f0@localhost>
Date: Sun, 09 Jul 2006 04:42:22 -0700
To: Martin Duerst <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>, Mark Davis <mark.davis@icu-project.org>
From: Ted Hardie <hardie@qualcomm.com>
Subject: Re: [Ltru] Good news: draft-ietf-ltru-matching approved by the IESG
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
X-Spam-Score: -2.5 (--)
X-Scan-Signature: 7655788c23eb79e336f5f8ba8bce7906
Cc: LTRU Working Group <ltru@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ltru@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Language Tag Registry Update working group discussion list <ltru.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru>, <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/ltru>
List-Post: <mailto:ltru@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru>, <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: ltru-bounces@ietf.org

At 2:22 PM +0900 7/8/06, Martin Duerst wrote:
>At 00:27 06/07/08, Mark Davis wrote:
>
>>BTW, any word on when the two RFCs will be published?
>
>No. At the minimum, we have to wait for two months for potential
>appeals. Then, if there is an appeal, we have to wait for it to
>be dealt with. After that, things are up to the RFC Editor. You
>can check their queue at http://www.rfc-editor.org/queue.html.

This isn't quite true.  Someone filing an appeal has two months to do so,
but that doesn't mean there is an automatic wait of two months; for
drafts which are expedited (commonly because of dependencies
on that draft holding up other publication), the RFC could appear quite
quickly.  Even normal processing can occur before two months if the
queue happens to be well-drained at the moment the draft enters.

What that implies is that an upheld appeal after publication results in
a new document obsoleting the old one, rather than an update prior
publication.

			regards,
				Ted

_______________________________________________
Ltru mailing list
Ltru@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru