[Ltru] RE: Pointers from registry to documentation

"Addison Phillips" <addison@yahoo-inc.com> Wed, 28 June 2006 19:11 UTC

Received: from [] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FvfS0-0006U8-PO; Wed, 28 Jun 2006 15:11:48 -0400
Received: from [] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FvfRz-0006U3-Qe for ltru@ietf.org; Wed, 28 Jun 2006 15:11:47 -0400
Received: from mrout2.yahoo.com ([]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FvfRy-0000ux-Bo for ltru@ietf.org; Wed, 28 Jun 2006 15:11:47 -0400
Received: from duringpersonlx (duringperson-lx.corp.yahoo.com []) by mrout2.yahoo.com (8.13.6/8.13.4/y.out) with ESMTP id k5SJ2BI7006281; Wed, 28 Jun 2006 12:02:11 -0700 (PDT)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=serpent; d=yahoo-inc.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:x-mailer:x-mimeole:in-reply-to:thread-index; b=FzMt6nQQvFkVrLPl56uKwDZt7gn3rFmnsy0W5LqZ03AGR0xevDsdyKQIgMFLBIHc
From: Addison Phillips <addison@yahoo-inc.com>
To: 'Doug Ewell' <dewell@adelphia.net>, ietf-languages@iana.org, 'LTRU Working Group' <ltru@ietf.org>
Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2006 12:02:11 -0700
Message-ID: <001201c69ae5$5ca98680$9fcd15ac@ds.corp.yahoo.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2869
In-Reply-To: <04ac01c69ad0$48c2f850$040aa8c0@DGBP7M81>
Thread-Index: Acaa0I+d+zrdOyFgTbmunMVHp+L/HQAFJgXA
X-Spam-Score: -15.0 (---------------)
X-Scan-Signature: d8ae4fd88fcaf47c1a71c804d04f413d
Subject: [Ltru] RE: Pointers from registry to documentation
X-BeenThere: ltru@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Language Tag Registry Update working group discussion list <ltru.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru>, <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/ltru>
List-Post: <mailto:ltru@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru>, <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: ltru-bounces@ietf.org

FWIW, the original proposal for file-level comments was made here:


The issue was tracked in the issue tracker here:


And the resolution was:

After discussion, rough consensus was that this as a "nice to have"
rather than an essential addition, and that it was more important
to finish the WG last call and submit the draft for publication.
Consequently, this item is marked "rejected".

Addison Phillips
Internationalization Architect - Yahoo! Inc.

Internationalization is an architecture.
It is not a feature.  

> -----Original Message-----
> From: ietf-languages-bounces@alvestrand.no 
> [mailto:ietf-languages-bounces@alvestrand.no] On Behalf Of Doug Ewell
> Sent: mercredi 28 juin 2006 09:31
> To: ietf-languages@iana.org; LTRU Working Group
> Subject: Re: Pointers from registry to documentation
> Richard Ishida <ishida at w3 dot org> wrote:
> > I have been given an action by the W3C Architecture Domain 
> to request 
> > that the language subtag registry at 
> > http://www.iana.org/assignments/language-subtag-registry contain a 
> > pointer to the document that explains what the field names mean.
> >
> > Would it be possible to include a comment at the top of the 
> document 
> > containing the URI of the spec?
> Early "planning" versions of the Registry were in a 
> vertical-bar-delimited format, not record-jar, and did 
> contain a header 
> comment explaining the nature of the file and describing the fields. 
> When we switched to record-jar in April 2005, there was no 
> provision for 
> a file-level comment, only the "Comments:" fields that applies to 
> individual records.  Around August, someone apparently 
> proposed adding a 
> file-level comment, but there was little support at the time 
> for adding 
> this.  I can't find the exact thread at the moment.
> I think the general feeling was that the RFC should point to the 
> Registry, not necessarily the other way around.
> The LTRU Working Group could choose to reopen this topic at 
> the time it 
> revises RFC 3066bis to incorporate ISO 639-3-based subtags.
> --
> Doug Ewell
> Fullerton, California, USA
> http://users.adelphia.net/~dewell/
> _______________________________________________
> Ietf-languages mailing list
> Ietf-languages@alvestrand.no
> http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/ietf-languages

Ltru mailing list