IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Ltru] Re: RFC 4646 production "grandfathered" considered harmful

John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org> Mon, 18 September 2006 01:36 UTC

Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GP841-0004OB-DB; Sun, 17 Sep 2006 21:36:49 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GP840-0004O6-4H for ltru@ietf.org; Sun, 17 Sep 2006 21:36:48 -0400
Received: from mercury.ccil.org ([192.190.237.100]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GP83y-0006xa-Tz for ltru@ietf.org; Sun, 17 Sep 2006 21:36:48 -0400
Received: from cowan by mercury.ccil.org with local (Exim 4.34) id 1GP83y-0002Tm-Fu; Sun, 17 Sep 2006 21:36:46 -0400
Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2006 21:36:46 -0400
To: Frank Ellermann <nobody@xyzzy.claranet.de>
Subject: Re: [Ltru] Re: RFC 4646 production "grandfathered" considered harmful
Message-ID: <20060918013646.GK3003@ccil.org>
References: <E1GOtou-0002Yt-JL@megatron.ietf.org> <012001c6da7a$a95c46a0$6401a8c0@DGBP7M81> <450DF53A.380@xyzzy.claranet.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <450DF53A.380@xyzzy.claranet.de>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
From: John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org>
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 08170828343bcf1325e4a0fb4584481c
Cc: ltru@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ltru@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Language Tag Registry Update working group discussion list <ltru.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru>, <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/ltru>
List-Post: <mailto:ltru@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru>, <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: ltru-bounces@ietf.org

Frank Ellermann scripsit:

> "Almost irregular" is a registered tag with a reference
> to an unregistered subtag, and "zh-hakka" is the only tag
> with this strange "feature" (after 4645bis adds cmn).

How is zh-hakka different from zh-xiang or zh-guoyu (except
that the latter is deprecated)?

-- 
John Cowan        http://ccil.org/~cowan   cowan@ccil.org
Lope de Vega: "It wonders me I can speak at all.  Some caitiff rogue did
rudely yerk me on the knob, wherefrom my wits still wander."
An Englishman: "Ay, a filchman to the nab betimes 'll leave a man
crank for a spell." --Harry Turtledove, Ruled Britannia

_______________________________________________
Ltru mailing list
Ltru@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email