IETF Logo Mail Archive

RE: [Ltru] Re: Proposal for a subtag registration (fr-2004-ORTOGRAF)

Peter Constable <petercon@microsoft.com> Fri, 14 December 2007 15:09 UTC

Return-path: <ltru-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1J3CA7-0007jB-TC; Fri, 14 Dec 2007 10:09:15 -0500
Received: from ltru by megatron.ietf.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1J3CA6-0007h8-P2 for ltru-confirm+ok@megatron.ietf.org; Fri, 14 Dec 2007 10:09:14 -0500
Received: from [10.90.34.44] (helo=chiedprmail1.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1J3CA6-0007h0-98 for ltru@ietf.org; Fri, 14 Dec 2007 10:09:14 -0500
Received: from mail1.microsoft.com ([131.107.115.212] helo=smtp.microsoft.com) by chiedprmail1.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1J3CA5-0008Ng-VC for ltru@ietf.org; Fri, 14 Dec 2007 10:09:14 -0500
Received: from tk5-exhub-c104.redmond.corp.microsoft.com (157.54.70.185) by TK5-EXGWY-E801.partners.extranet.microsoft.com (10.251.56.50) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.1.222.3; Fri, 14 Dec 2007 07:09:13 -0800
Received: from NA-EXMSG-C117.redmond.corp.microsoft.com ([157.54.62.44]) by tk5-exhub-c104.redmond.corp.microsoft.com ([157.54.70.185]) with mapi; Fri, 14 Dec 2007 07:09:13 -0800
From: Peter Constable <petercon@microsoft.com>
To: LTRU Working Group <ltru@ietf.org>
Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2007 07:09:07 -0800
Subject: RE: [Ltru] Re: Proposal for a subtag registration (fr-2004-ORTOGRAF)
Thread-Topic: [Ltru] Re: Proposal for a subtag registration (fr-2004-ORTOGRAF)
Thread-Index: Acg+Yf8nNo2s3UUATsuuapUhkU1gIQAALLOQ
Message-ID: <DDB6DE6E9D27DD478AE6D1BBBB83579561E539F9C0@NA-EXMSG-C117.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
References: <00eb01c83e61$f938d3e0$6601a8c0@DGBP7M81>
In-Reply-To: <00eb01c83e61$f938d3e0$6601a8c0@DGBP7M81>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 68c8cc8a64a9d0402e43b8eee9fc4199
X-BeenThere: ltru@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Language Tag Registry Update working group discussion list <ltru.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru>, <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/ltru>
List-Post: <mailto:ltru@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru>, <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1133170178=="
Errors-To: ltru-bounces@ietf.org

> From: Doug Ewell [mailto:dewell@roadrunner.com]

> I can think of a few reasons why we don't want true junk in the
> Registry
> (not to imply that M. Périard's request is junk, nothing of the sort),
> but this one doesn't sway me.

Then please come up with an alternate junk-filtering-rationale statement. If we're trying to get some request to refine his proposal to make it convincing in a case in which it borders on junk, and that person starts asking why we care, we should be able to offer crisp answers rather than start debating that point.

I predict that the frequency of these kinds of requests will *increase*, not decrease or remain stable.


Peter

_______________________________________________
Ltru mailing list
Ltru@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru

v2.19.0 | Report a Bug | By Email