Re: [Ltru] Re: no teleconference this week

"Doug Ewell" <dewell@roadrunner.com> Sat, 08 December 2007 13:04 UTC

Return-path: <ltru-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1J0zLu-0004X9-3J; Sat, 08 Dec 2007 08:04:18 -0500
Received: from ltru by megatron.ietf.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1J0zLt-0004X0-5W for ltru-confirm+ok@megatron.ietf.org; Sat, 08 Dec 2007 08:04:17 -0500
Received: from [10.90.34.44] (helo=chiedprmail1.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1J0zLs-0004Ws-RP for ltru@ietf.org; Sat, 08 Dec 2007 08:04:16 -0500
Received: from mta6.adelphia.net ([68.168.78.190]) by chiedprmail1.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1J0zLs-00070H-FQ for ltru@ietf.org; Sat, 08 Dec 2007 08:04:16 -0500
Received: from DGBP7M81 ([76.167.184.182]) by mta13.adelphia.net (InterMail vM.6.01.05.02 201-2131-123-102-20050715) with SMTP id <20071206145732.EOPB21128.mta13.adelphia.net@DGBP7M81>; Thu, 6 Dec 2007 09:57:32 -0500
Message-ID: <019401c83818$54f2ada0$6601a8c0@DGBP7M81>
From: Doug Ewell <dewell@roadrunner.com>
To: LTRU Working Group <ltru@ietf.org>
References: <E1IzkOt-0006Yt-T7@megatron.ietf.org> <001101c836f9$261ed2d0$6601a8c0@DGBP7M81> <30b660a20712042051s28df0f50ib44c8beca615c5cc@mail.gmail.com> <47562F67.6060905@yahoo-inc.com> <004001c836fe$b495d310$6601a8c0@DGBP7M81> <6.0.0.20.2.20071206162427.0c17f560@localhost>
Subject: Re: [Ltru] Re: no teleconference this week
Date: Thu, 06 Dec 2007 06:57:32 -0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format="flowed"; charset="utf-8"; reply-type="original"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.3138
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3198
X-Spam-Score: 1.6 (+)
X-Scan-Signature: 08170828343bcf1325e4a0fb4584481c
Cc:
X-BeenThere: ltru@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Language Tag Registry Update working group discussion list <ltru.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru>, <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/ltru>
List-Post: <mailto:ltru@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru>, <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: ltru-bounces@ietf.org

Martin Duerst <duerst at it dot aoyama dot ac dot jp> wrote:

> A really cheap way out would be to put the necessary language in RFC 
> 4646bis, and leave RFC 4647 alone. Just an idea, probably not a very 
> good one, it depends on the exact text that's needed.

It might be that the new text in Section 4.1 is all we need to say, or 
can say.

--
Doug Ewell  *  Fullerton, California, USA  *  RFC 4645  *  UTN #14
http://home.roadrunner.com/~dewell
http://www1.ietf.org/html.charters/ltru-charter.html
http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/ietf-languages  ˆ



_______________________________________________
Ltru mailing list
Ltru@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru