Re: [Ltru] Fwd: [apps-discuss] Defining a CBOR tag for RFC 5646 Language Tags

Randy Presuhn <randy_presuhn@mindspring.com> Mon, 12 May 2014 05:44 UTC

Return-Path: <randy_presuhn@mindspring.com>
X-Original-To: ltru@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ltru@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 885741A03F6 for <ltru@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 11 May 2014 22:44:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0N5roGN9jFBv for <ltru@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 11 May 2014 22:44:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from elasmtp-junco.atl.sa.earthlink.net (elasmtp-junco.atl.sa.earthlink.net [209.86.89.63]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 600311A03F5 for <ltru@ietf.org>; Sun, 11 May 2014 22:44:34 -0700 (PDT)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=dk20050327; d=mindspring.com; b=ATb2xStd8ron1tJeD5+xnr3nq+MysSE9tiy3WH2G6ccGfXsP5fwfBTRric/dXkUV; h=Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:To:Subject:Mime-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Mailer:X-ELNK-Trace:X-Originating-IP;
Received: from [209.86.224.29] (helo=mswamui-cedar.atl.sa.earthlink.net) by elasmtp-junco.atl.sa.earthlink.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from <randy_presuhn@mindspring.com>) id 1Wjj2K-0001Sl-Gd; Mon, 12 May 2014 01:44:28 -0400
Received: from 76.254.52.232 by webmail.earthlink.net with HTTP; Mon, 12 May 2014 01:44:28 -0400
Message-ID: <18971982.1399873468367.JavaMail.root@mswamui-cedar.atl.sa.earthlink.net>
Date: Sun, 11 May 2014 22:44:28 -0700 (GMT-07:00)
From: Randy Presuhn <randy_presuhn@mindspring.com>
To: Ira McDonald <blueroofmusic@gmail.com>, LTRU Working Group <ltru@ietf.org>, Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>, Peter Occil <poccil14@gmail.com>, Ira McDonald <blueroofmusic@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Mailer: EarthLink Zoo Mail 1.0
X-ELNK-Trace: 4488c18417c9426da92b9037bc8bcf44d4c20f6b8d69d88891b749bef7332bbc2a34d5b374703617155d6e00d349f813350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c
X-Originating-IP: 209.86.224.29
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ltru/EPPjeKEzkm1eCm8LKNuImnLEMFo
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sun, 11 May 2014 23:30:25 -0700
Subject: Re: [Ltru] Fwd: [apps-discuss] Defining a CBOR tag for RFC 5646 Language Tags
X-BeenThere: ltru@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Randy Presuhn <randy_presuhn@mindspring.com>
List-Id: Language Tag Registry Update working group discussion list <ltru.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ltru>, <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ltru/>
List-Post: <mailto:ltru@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru>, <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 May 2014 05:44:37 -0000

Hi -

Is representation of multi-lingual strings a concern?

E.g.  "She said 'Bonjour', and then 'Ciao'."

Randy

>From: Ira McDonald <blueroofmusic@gmail.com>
>Sent: May 11, 2014 4:50 PM
>To: LTRU Working Group <ltru@ietf.org>rg>, Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>rg>, Peter Occil <poccil14@gmail.com>om>, Ira McDonald <blueroofmusic@gmail.com>
>Subject: [Ltru] Fwd: [apps-discuss] Defining a CBOR tag for RFC 5646	Language Tags
>
>Hi,
>
><oops - retrying with the correct LTRU WG address this time, I hope...>
>
>Forwarding this note to the LTRU list for language tag experts to review.
>Please copy your reply to IETF Apps Discuss list (see below).
>
>Cheers,
>- Ira McDonald
>
>
>---------- Forwarded message ----------
>From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
>Date: Sun, May 11, 2014 at 6:48 PM
>Subject: [apps-discuss] Defining a CBOR tag for RFC 5646 Language Tags
>To: IETF Apps Discuss <apps-discuss@ietf.org>
>Cc: Peter Occil <poccil14@gmail.com>
>
>
>If you care about language tags, I hope the subject got your
>attention.  If you don't, please ignore this request for assistance.
>
>Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR, RFC 7049) is a binary
>format for structured objects.  CBOR has a number of pre-defined data
>types and allows additional data types to be registered as "tags".
>Among the pre-defined data types is a text string (Unicode characters,
>encoded in UTF-8).  No facility is pre-defined for associating a
>Language Tag with such a string.
>
>A new CBOR tag is being proposed for combining a CBOR text string with
>a Language Tag.  The (single-page) proposal is in:
>
>http://peteroupc.github.io/CBOR/langtags.html
>
>The proposal is almost trivially obvious (pair a language tag with an
>UTF-8 string in a two-element array) and looks right to me.  But I'm
>not an expert in Language Tags, and silly mistakes are being made by
>non-experts all the time.
>
>If you are an expert in Language Tags:
>-- Is anything missing or could anything be done in a better way?
>-- Or does this really simply look right?
>
>Responses to me privately or to the list are appreciated.
>
>Grüße, Carsten
>
>_______________________________________________
>apps-discuss mailing list
>apps-discuss@ietf.org
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss