Re: [Ltru] Availability of 't' extension document and data
Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im> Wed, 07 December 2011 19:28 UTC
Return-Path: <stpeter@stpeter.im>
X-Original-To: ltru@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ltru@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72C1B21F8783 for <ltru@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 Dec 2011 11:28:41 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.597
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.597 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.298, BAYES_00=-2.599, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id koKp+wiRRMqw for <ltru@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 Dec 2011 11:28:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from stpeter.im (mailhost.stpeter.im [207.210.219.225]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15AEA21F877F for <ltru@ietf.org>; Wed, 7 Dec 2011 11:28:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from normz.cisco.com (unknown [72.163.0.129]) (Authenticated sender: stpeter) by stpeter.im (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5717D42306; Wed, 7 Dec 2011 12:35:58 -0700 (MST)
Message-ID: <4EDFBE67.7060604@stpeter.im>
Date: Wed, 07 Dec 2011 12:28:39 -0700
From: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; rv:8.0) Gecko/20111105 Thunderbird/8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Mark Davis ☕ <mark@macchiato.com>
References: <20111207111436.665a7a7059d7ee80bb4d670165c8327d.912aa587c9.wbe@email03.secureserver.net> <CAJ2xs_FTJa1A4-vJVxPYoL6Dz07esFegAD49cFaZmiSsPLEQmg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAJ2xs_FTJa1A4-vJVxPYoL6Dz07esFegAD49cFaZmiSsPLEQmg@mail.gmail.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.3.3
OpenPGP: url=https://stpeter.im/stpeter.asc
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Cc: ltru@ietf.org, Doug Ewell <doug@ewellic.org>
Subject: Re: [Ltru] Availability of 't' extension document and data
X-BeenThere: ltru@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Language Tag Registry Update working group discussion list <ltru.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ltru>, <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ltru>
List-Post: <mailto:ltru@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru>, <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Dec 2011 19:28:41 -0000
On 12/7/11 11:42 AM, Mark Davis ☕ wrote: > The editorial process for the RFCs involves the authors, so there is no > danger of that happening (and I've never seen it happen in less than 2 > months anyway). So I wouldn't lose any sleep over this one, Doug. Right now it's running around 6 weeks on average. In any case, this kind of thing can be fixed during AUTH48. Peter -- Peter Saint-Andre https://stpeter.im/
- [Ltru] Availability of 't' extension document and… Doug Ewell
- Re: [Ltru] Availability of 't' extension document… Mark Davis ☕
- Re: [Ltru] Availability of 't' extension document… Randy Presuhn
- Re: [Ltru] Availability of 't' extension document… Peter Saint-Andre