[Ltru] Obsolete descriptions (was: "X" vs. 'X (macrolanguage)")
"Frank Ellermann" <nobody@xyzzy.claranet.de> Sat, 08 December 2007 20:48 UTC
Return-path: <ltru-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1J16bO-0001PJ-70; Sat, 08 Dec 2007 15:48:46 -0500
Received: from ltru by megatron.ietf.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1J16bN-0001Lq-HP for ltru-confirm+ok@megatron.ietf.org; Sat, 08 Dec 2007 15:48:45 -0500
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1J16bN-0001LJ-7a for ltru@lists.ietf.org; Sat, 08 Dec 2007 15:48:45 -0500
Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.229.2] helo=ciao.gmane.org) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1J16bM-0005TS-RX for ltru@lists.ietf.org; Sat, 08 Dec 2007 15:48:45 -0500
Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1J16bE-00032I-Gq for ltru@lists.ietf.org; Sat, 08 Dec 2007 20:48:36 +0000
Received: from c-180-160-62.hh.dial.de.ignite.net ([62.180.160.62]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for <ltru@lists.ietf.org>; Sat, 08 Dec 2007 20:48:36 +0000
Received: from nobody by c-180-160-62.hh.dial.de.ignite.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for <ltru@lists.ietf.org>; Sat, 08 Dec 2007 20:48:36 +0000
X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/
To: ltru@lists.ietf.org
From: Frank Ellermann <nobody@xyzzy.claranet.de>
Date: Sat, 08 Dec 2007 21:50:25 +0100
Organization: <http://purl.net/xyzzy>
Lines: 34
Message-ID: <fjevuj$bgs$1@ger.gmane.org>
References: <000501c83960$e8e514f0$6601a8c0@DGBP7M81><20071208064801.GC22311@mercury.ccil.org><30b660a20712080938t36e47861gfccdd65f4d2b56cf@mail.gmail.com><002601c839c3$aec71df0$6601a8c0@DGBP7M81> <fjeq5k$r0g$1@ger.gmane.org> <DDB6DE6E9D27DD478AE6D1BBBB83579561E5143282@NA-EXMSG-C117.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: c-180-160-62.hh.dial.de.ignite.net
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1914
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1914
X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: bb8f917bb6b8da28fc948aeffb74aa17
Cc:
Subject: [Ltru] Obsolete descriptions (was: "X" vs. 'X (macrolanguage)")
X-BeenThere: ltru@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Frank Ellermann <hmdmhdfmhdjmzdtjmzdtzktdkztdjz@gmail.com>
List-Id: Language Tag Registry Update working group discussion list <ltru.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru>, <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/ltru>
List-Post: <mailto:ltru@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru>, <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: ltru-bounces@ietf.org
Peter Constable wrote: >> 3066 and 4646 went to great lengths that this is >> not possible, including a promise from ISO in the >> text. > Whate are you referring to? I am not aware that > IETF requested any promises from ISO wrt descriptions. Bottom of <http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4646#page-9>: The promise in RFC 3066 and 4646 is about alpha-2 and alpha-3 codes, for an existing alpha-3 code for a language (identified by its description) there won't be a new alpha-2 code (with the same description because it's the same language). My interpretation wrt the case at hand added in parentheses. >> The SIL pages claim that the description for "sw" >> is "Swahili (macrolanguage)". The 4646 registry >> claims that it's "Swahili", at least one of them >> is wrong. > SIL's pages in relation to this entry in ISO 639-3 > are not wrong wrt ISO 639. Then the 4646 registry must be wrong, it's supposed to reflect whatever description ISO 639-1 offers for an alpha-2 code. Caveat, I looked up the ISO 639-1 "sw" on the SIL Web form, not some ISO 639-3 "sw". Frank _______________________________________________ Ltru mailing list Ltru@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru
- [Ltru] "X" vs. 'X (macrolanguage)" Doug Ewell
- Re: [Ltru] "X" vs. 'X (macrolanguage)" John Cowan
- Re: [Ltru] "X" vs. 'X (macrolanguage)" Mark Davis
- Re: [Ltru] "X" vs. 'X (macrolanguage)" Doug Ewell
- Re: [Ltru] "X" vs. 'X (macrolanguage)" Doug Ewell
- Re: [Ltru] "X" vs. 'X (macrolanguage)" Mark Davis
- [Ltru] Re: "X" vs. 'X (macrolanguage)" Frank Ellermann
- Re: [Ltru] "X" vs. 'X (macrolanguage)" Mark Davis
- RE: [Ltru] "X" vs. 'X (macrolanguage)" Peter Constable
- RE: [Ltru] "X" vs. 'X (macrolanguage)" Peter Constable
- Re: [Ltru] "X" vs. 'X (macrolanguage)" Doug Ewell
- Re: [Ltru] "X" vs. 'X (macrolanguage)" Mark Davis
- RE: [Ltru] "X" vs. 'X (macrolanguage)" Peter Constable
- RE: [Ltru] "X" vs. 'X (macrolanguage)" Peter Constable
- RE: [Ltru] "X" vs. 'X (macrolanguage)" Peter Constable
- RE: [Ltru] Re: "X" vs. 'X (macrolanguage)" Peter Constable
- Re: [Ltru] "X" vs. 'X (macrolanguage)" Doug Ewell
- Re: [Ltru] "X" vs. 'X (macrolanguage)" Mark Davis
- Re: [Ltru] "X" vs. 'X (macrolanguage)" Doug Ewell
- [Ltru] Re: "X" vs. 'X (macrolanguage)" Doug Ewell
- [Ltru] Obsolete descriptions (was: "X" vs. 'X (ma… Frank Ellermann
- [Ltru] Re: "X" vs. 'X (macrolanguage)" Frank Ellermann
- RE: [Ltru] "X" vs. 'X (macrolanguage)" Peter Constable
- RE: [Ltru] "X" vs. 'X (macrolanguage)" Kent Karlsson
- RE: [Ltru] Obsolete descriptions (was: "X" vs. 'X… Peter Constable
- Re: [Ltru] "X" vs. 'X (macrolanguage)" Mark Davis
- Re: [Ltru] "X" vs. 'X (macrolanguage)" Doug Ewell