Re: [Ltru] Re: XML

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Martin Duerst yazmış:
> At 05:30 07/06/22, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
> 
>> Your schema seems quite clsoe to mine
>> (http://www.langtag.net/registries/ltru.rnc) and I suggest that people
>> interested in moving this schema from the current draft to a "real"
>> schema, production-ready, gather in private since XML work is not well
>> received on the LTRU list.
OK, looks like you guys have it covered. I would just prefer using XML
Schema for schema, because i think it's the most standard way, and while
i'm not an XML guru per se, it is likely to be the most powerful as well.
Also, it might be worth considering supporting multiple languages for
some textual elements (by requiring a lang attribute), as in:
	<Description lang="en">
	Unified Turkic Latin Alphabet (Historical)
	</Description>
> 
> The statement in the last clause is only partially true.
> When I made an attempt at a consensus call on this issue (many months ago),
> my recollection was that a slight majority of the people responding
> favored moving to XML, but that that majority wasn't strong enough
> to make the change, in particular because the people who would have
> had to do the actual work (read: editors) weren't very excited.
> 
> It is true that if we stay with the current state (no XML), then
> we shouldn't use the list to discuss XML, because we want to
> concentrate to get our documents out.
For what it's worth, i'm ready to vote for XML. Lemme know if you folks
ever need an extra vote.

- --
My public GPG key (ID 0x262839AF) is at: http://keyserver.veridis.com:11371
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.1 (Cygwin)

iD8DBQFGe/71O75ytyYoOa8RAoFTAKCpd2q1vXzHJa5uEDOL/I6MJDOk5gCgkQ90
2rSYixA8FS9e1aVhOFcSS3I=
=VtBl
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


_______________________________________________
Ltru mailing list
Ltru@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru