Re: [Ltru] Macrolanguage, Extlang. The Sami language situatation as example

Leif Halvard Silli <lhs@malform.no> Wed, 28 May 2008 01:23 UTC

Return-Path: <ltru-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ltru-archive@megatron.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-ltru-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6503D3A6B4A; Tue, 27 May 2008 18:23:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: ltru@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ltru@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 603B23A68D9 for <ltru@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 27 May 2008 18:23:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.736
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.736 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.137, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RGB57c1XxQiZ for <ltru@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 27 May 2008 18:23:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lakepoint.domeneshop.no (lakepoint.domeneshop.no [194.63.248.54]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5314A3A6B4A for <ltru@ietf.org>; Tue, 27 May 2008 18:23:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 10013.local (cm-84.208.108.246.getinternet.no [84.208.108.246]) (authenticated bits=0) by lakepoint.domeneshop.no (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m4S1Npsv015145; Wed, 28 May 2008 03:23:51 +0200
Message-ID: <483CB429.7070605@malform.no>
Date: Wed, 28 May 2008 03:23:53 +0200
From: Leif Halvard Silli <lhs@malform.no>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X Mach-O; en-US; rv:1.8.1b1) Gecko/20060724 Thunderbird/2.0a1 Mnenhy/0.7.4.666
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: debbie@ictmarketing.co.uk
References: <01c301c8bbe5$8c2810c0$6801a8c0@oemcomputer> <008a01c8bedc$72b97b20$6801a8c0@oemcomputer> <30b660a20805252132g28ff50b0kd5b04d6f47ca35d2@mail.gmail.com> <002001c8bef3$e0497520$6801a8c0@oemcomputer> <30b660a20805262003j21fff6c4tf20d59be11f28633@mail.gmail.com> <483BA015.3090004@malform.no><DDB6DE6E9D27DD478AE6D1BBBB83579562E2A410C5@NA-EXMSG-C117.redmond.corp.microsoft.com> <483C51EE.6070100@malform.no> <0d7601c8c02d$48a19730$0a00a8c0@CPQ86763045110> <00c701c8c034$d00fade0$702f09a0$@net> <0d8f01c8c039$69df9b70$0a00a8c0@CPQ86763045110>
In-Reply-To: <0d8f01c8c039$69df9b70$0a00a8c0@CPQ86763045110>
Cc: 'LTRU Working Group' <ltru@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Ltru] Macrolanguage, Extlang. The Sami language situatation as example
X-BeenThere: ltru@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Language Tag Registry Update working group discussion list <ltru.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru>, <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/ltru>
List-Post: <mailto:ltru@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru>, <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: ltru-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ltru-bounces@ietf.org

Debbie Garside 2008-05-27 22.36:

> Hi Don
> 
> IMHO, possible use cases of the RFC, needs, unmet needs and gaps are
> relevant to this WG and the development of the standard.  Where we need to
> draw the line is when the discussion comes into the realm of re-designing
> ISO 639 or making language classification decisions. [...]

This was mostly a reply to Peter. On the whole I agree with you.
-- 
leif halvard silli
_______________________________________________
Ltru mailing list
Ltru@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru