[Ltru] Re: zh-hakka

Frank Ellermann <nobody at xyzzy dot claranet dot de> wrote:

>> This would avoid the need for repetition when calculating the 
>> preferred value.
>
> It also simplifies pointer checks, there's never a danger of A -> B -> 
> C -> A, if A *_must_* point to something that has no further pointer.

I think we are again trying to legislate against the unthinkable.  Once 
the Registry has been created, only newly formed subtags (and tags 
composed from them) get to be Preferred-Values.  There is no reasonable 
chance that ietf-languages will ever make an older (sub)tag the 
Preferred-Value for a newer one.

--
Doug Ewell
Fullerton, California, USA
http://users.adelphia.net/~dewell/
RFC 4645  *  UTN #14

_______________________________________________
Ltru mailing list
Ltru@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru