IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Ltru] Re: Review of 4646bis-10, sections 3.5 to App. B

"Frank Ellermann" <nobody@xyzzy.claranet.de> Mon, 10 December 2007 04:33 UTC

Return-path: <ltru-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1J1aKK-0007uT-L8; Sun, 09 Dec 2007 23:33:08 -0500
Received: from ltru by megatron.ietf.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1J1aKI-0007uM-UC for ltru-confirm+ok@megatron.ietf.org; Sun, 09 Dec 2007 23:33:06 -0500
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1J1aKI-0007uE-J2 for ltru@lists.ietf.org; Sun, 09 Dec 2007 23:33:06 -0500
Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.229.2] helo=ciao.gmane.org) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1J1aKG-0005ua-Bl for ltru@lists.ietf.org; Sun, 09 Dec 2007 23:33:06 -0500
Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1J1aKC-0000LV-At for ltru@lists.ietf.org; Mon, 10 Dec 2007 04:33:00 +0000
Received: from c-180-160-8.hh.dial.de.ignite.net ([62.180.160.8]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for <ltru@lists.ietf.org>; Mon, 10 Dec 2007 04:33:00 +0000
Received: from nobody by c-180-160-8.hh.dial.de.ignite.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for <ltru@lists.ietf.org>; Mon, 10 Dec 2007 04:33:00 +0000
X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/
To: ltru@lists.ietf.org
From: Frank Ellermann <nobody@xyzzy.claranet.de>
Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2007 05:34:56 +0100
Organization: <http://purl.net/xyzzy>
Lines: 12
Message-ID: <fjifhj$hlt$1@ger.gmane.org>
References: <E1J17Ll-000280-BI@megatron.ietf.org><00b601c83a21$d947c3f0$6601a8c0@DGBP7M81><fjgf9i$e4q$1@ger.gmane.org> <20071209162727.GJ22311@mercury.ccil.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: c-180-160-8.hh.dial.de.ignite.net
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1914
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1914
X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 7a6398bf8aaeabc7a7bb696b6b0a2aad
Cc:
Subject: [Ltru] Re: Review of 4646bis-10, sections 3.5 to App. B
X-BeenThere: ltru@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Frank Ellermann <hmdmhdfmhdjmzdtjmzdtzktdkztdjz@gmail.com>
List-Id: Language Tag Registry Update working group discussion list <ltru.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru>, <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/ltru>
List-Post: <mailto:ltru@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru>, <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: ltru-bounces@ietf.org

John Cowan wrote:
 
  ["my BU": there and back again]
>> You also can't say that the "new" BU is a collision
>> with the old BU, and therefore MY needs a "deprecated,
>> now use UN number".
 
> Why not?

It fails in a giggle test, like the "revived FX" example.

 Frank



_______________________________________________
Ltru mailing list
Ltru@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email