Re: [Ltru] Any information on SF?

Mark Davis ⌛ <mark@macchiato.com> Thu, 06 August 2009 18:34 UTC

Return-Path: <mark.edward.davis@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ltru@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ltru@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C76213A6E39 for <ltru@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 6 Aug 2009 11:34:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.876
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.876 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.800, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BjKnepe3768l for <ltru@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 6 Aug 2009 11:34:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from wf-out-1314.google.com (wf-out-1314.google.com [209.85.200.175]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02F7E28C16D for <ltru@ietf.org>; Thu, 6 Aug 2009 11:34:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by wf-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id 28so415714wff.31 for <ltru@ietf.org>; Thu, 06 Aug 2009 11:34:21 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:received:in-reply-to :references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc :content-type; bh=KQXBn17ABKt3fTUbeHsrlHyFg+KcvKqTUf/UDI6hrlM=; b=v1vk3LfSGB1TRzxkaJrC33Hfu4Nn8EXPQtDfS2yjhf2FPsHPJsRRn1N/IJKz+GyQwq J7yVXC6OzGetQfdqG+8WOIhbmEYAoBPoH8FkiljIvJtzFxMYPoj+0Kfh0xhkb77PtOKa lCI01V77YoPkUQRaWm/LdyeONGeIL0/sGMfXI=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; b=WRShc7Q4AMm2F7u+w3d07QwRe9GJiIpV7qgzPN23Gp2Ir3C4/INdmb7GnkBi4pFjYV YhFJtlkStdNPcEO6vO1gjBvBuwi6P6IvHlk93bseVeTKbSS2vXKAmluA+/yisSkNi2JA 4oKFYxDslPt+TwBzYPH3FQgLBQ/unsyKxby9Y=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: mark.edward.davis@gmail.com
Received: by 10.142.126.18 with SMTP id y18mr47873wfc.262.1249583661695; Thu, 06 Aug 2009 11:34:21 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <001401ca16c4$286e5180$6801a8c0@oemcomputer>
References: <30b660a20908061116w60cfe214hf4b89bf783aeedf3@mail.gmail.com> <001401ca16c4$286e5180$6801a8c0@oemcomputer>
Date: Thu, 06 Aug 2009 11:34:21 -0700
X-Google-Sender-Auth: 89a19fe957ffdec1
Message-ID: <30b660a20908061134p1daa02cau9536cf302214d627@mail.gmail.com>
From: Mark Davis ⌛ <mark@macchiato.com>
To: Randy Presuhn <randy_presuhn@mindspring.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000e0cd30bd445c64004707d5e7a"
Cc: LTRU Working Group <ltru@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Ltru] Any information on SF?
X-BeenThere: ltru@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Language Tag Registry Update working group discussion list <ltru.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru>, <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ltru>
List-Post: <mailto:ltru@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru>, <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Aug 2009 18:34:42 -0000

I am NOT suggesting adding it to the registry. I just wanted to find out
what it is, to see if we need a mapping in CLDR.

Mark


On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 11:31, Randy Presuhn <randy_presuhn@mindspring.com>wrote:

> Hi -
>
> As technical contributor...
>
> My suggestion would be to not worry about it.
>
> As co-chair...
>
> It's *way* too late and too unlikely to be the source of
> any kind of problem to open it up as an issue here.  If
> someone thinks it would be *useful* to add it to the registry,
> ietf-languages@iana.org would be the place to do it.
>
> Randy
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Mark Davis ⌛" <mark@macchiato.com>
> To: "LTRU Working Group" <ltru@ietf.org>
> Sent: Thursday, August 06, 2009 11:16 AM
> Subject: [Ltru] Any information on SF?
>
>
> (That's not "San Francisco" or "Science Fiction", or any confluence of the
> two.)
>
> We're in the process of updating to the new IANA registry, and I was
> cross-checking to http://www.iso.org/iso/iso-3166-1_decoding_table. The
> code
>
> SF stands out.
>
> *Transitionally reserved*
> BU    Burma
> CS    SERBIA AND MONTENEGRO
> NT    Neutral Zone
> *SF    Finland     Not in IANA. CLDR maps to FI??
> *TP    East Timor
> YU    Yugoslavia
> ZR    Zaire
>
> I had first presumed that SF is not included because it was withdrawn
> before
> RFC1766. But SF is not even listed in
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ISO_3166-3 as a retired code. (ISO makes it
> exceptionally painful, as we all know, to get access to 3166-3:
> http://www.iso.org/iso/country_codes/background_on_iso_3166/iso_3166-3.htm
> ).
> Note that http://www.iso.org/iso/iso-3166-1_decoding_table definitely has
> some oddities. For example, instead of "officially assigned", for two items
> it has "officiellement attribué". So for all we know, SF is just a mistake
> in that table!
>
> Does anyone know more about the code SF?
>
> For comparison, here are the "Exceptionally Reserved", two of which are
> obsolete codes.
>
> *Exceptionally Reserved*
> AC    Ascension Island     ok
> CP    Clipperton Island     ok
> DG    Diego Garcia     ok
> EA    Ceuta, Melilla     ok
> EU    European Union     ok
> *FX    France, Metropolitan     Deprecated in IANA: IANA maps to FR
> *IC    Canary Islands     ok
> *SU    USSR     Deprecated in IANA: CLDR maps to RU AM AZ BY EE GE KZ KG LV
> LT MD TJ TM UA UZ
> *TA    Tristan da Cunha     ok
> *UK    UNITED KINGDOM     Not in IANA. CLDR maps to GB*
>
> Mark
>
>
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> > _______________________________________________
> > Ltru mailing list
> > Ltru@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ltru mailing list
> Ltru@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru
>