Re: [Ltru] draft-davis-t-langtag-ext

["Doug Ewell" <[e-mail]>]

I've read through this document and have no significant objections.

My earlier and oft-stated concerns about the data not being available
until the document is approved have been largely satisfied; I am
confident that the sample data in Section 2.9 will be representative of
the real data.

I'm looking forward to this extension structure becoming available for
use in language tags.

Editorial nits, neither of which should hold up approval:

1. In Section 2.5, item (a), "the mechanism subtag 'UNGEGN'" should be
changed to "the mechanism subtag 'ungegn'", using the same casing as the
tag which immediately follows.

2. In Section 2.9, paragraph 4, the XML structure example makes
reference to the "collation" key from the 'u' extension, which might be
confusing.

--
Doug Ewell | Thornton, Colorado, USA | RFC 5645, 4645, UTN #14
www.ewellic.org | www.facebook.com/doug.ewell | @DougEwell ­