IETF Logo Mail Archive

RE: [Ltru] Re: action item: "other" collections in 639

Peter Constable <petercon@microsoft.com> Sat, 01 December 2007 15:30 UTC

Return-path: <ltru-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IyUIF-0006dz-8T; Sat, 01 Dec 2007 10:30:11 -0500
Received: from ltru by megatron.ietf.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1IyUID-0006aB-Vn for ltru-confirm+ok@megatron.ietf.org; Sat, 01 Dec 2007 10:30:09 -0500
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IyUID-0006a3-MD for ltru@lists.ietf.org; Sat, 01 Dec 2007 10:30:09 -0500
Received: from mail2.microsoft.com ([131.107.115.215] helo=smtp.microsoft.com) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IyUIC-0003S9-Dd for ltru@lists.ietf.org; Sat, 01 Dec 2007 10:30:09 -0500
Received: from tk5-exhub-c103.redmond.corp.microsoft.com (157.54.70.186) by TK5-EXGWY-E802.partners.extranet.microsoft.com (10.251.56.168) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.1.222.3; Sat, 1 Dec 2007 07:29:33 -0800
Received: from NA-EXMSG-C117.redmond.corp.microsoft.com ([157.54.62.44]) by tk5-exhub-c103.redmond.corp.microsoft.com ([157.54.70.186]) with mapi; Sat, 1 Dec 2007 07:30:07 -0800
From: Peter Constable <petercon@microsoft.com>
To: "ltru@lists.ietf.org" <ltru@lists.ietf.org>
Date: Sat, 01 Dec 2007 07:30:02 -0800
Subject: RE: [Ltru] Re: action item: "other" collections in 639
Thread-Topic: [Ltru] Re: action item: "other" collections in 639
Thread-Index: Acg0KBG/jv+u0YTPQVeyIipBdToLowABq0aA
Message-ID: <DDB6DE6E9D27DD478AE6D1BBBB83579561E4CB310E@NA-EXMSG-C117.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
References: <E1IxWtu-0007Mu-3s@megatron.ietf.org><003d01c83254$ddd0cef0$6601a8c0@DGBP7M81><DDB6DE6E9D27DD478AE6D1BBBB83579561B42BB874@NA-EXMSG-C117.redmond.corp.microsoft.com><fimli5$lip$1@ger.gmane.org> <DDB6DE6E9D27DD478AE6D1BBBB83579561B42BB8E3@NA-EXMSG-C117.redmond.corp.microsoft.com> <firrnd$m5f$1@ger.gmane.org>
In-Reply-To: <firrnd$m5f$1@ger.gmane.org>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Spam-Score: -8.0 (--------)
X-Scan-Signature: 68c8cc8a64a9d0402e43b8eee9fc4199
Cc:
X-BeenThere: ltru@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Language Tag Registry Update working group discussion list <ltru.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru>, <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/ltru>
List-Post: <mailto:ltru@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru>, <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1231538349=="
Errors-To: ltru-bounces@ietf.org

> From: Frank Ellermann [mailto:nobody@xyzzy.claranet.de]

> >>> I've suggested in the past that removing collection IDs from
> >>> BCP47 might not be a bad idea, but on several occasions people
> >>> have indicated that they wish to have the collections kept.
>
> >> "Removing" can't fly.  Do you mean "not add new" (in the 4645bis
> >> bulk update), "deprecate old", or both ?
>
> > Deprecate, and not add new.
>
> Okay.  Then it could make sense to deprecate some giving a new
> preferred value based on your list.

Um... I have no idea what you're referring to: I haven't given any list that relates to collections, that I recall.


Peter

_______________________________________________
Ltru mailing list
Ltru@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email