[Ltru] Fw: resend - poll request

"Randy Presuhn" <randy_presuhn@mindspring.com> Tue, 04 May 2010 17:22 UTC

Return-Path: <randy_presuhn@mindspring.com>
X-Original-To: ltru@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ltru@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65B103A6CB8; Tue, 4 May 2010 10:22:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.5
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.5 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.499, BAYES_60=1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DfPWvqDbc1Y3; Tue, 4 May 2010 10:22:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from elasmtp-kukur.atl.sa.earthlink.net (elasmtp-kukur.atl.sa.earthlink.net []) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BBAF3A6A1B; Tue, 4 May 2010 10:20:20 -0700 (PDT)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=dk20050327; d=mindspring.com; b=nupFX/MVluPA1ApafatQ3R9oCC2R+6iv9WkPuftmBxhji5RKNzV0rZpQB6BFTlro; h=Received:Message-ID:From:To:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MimeOLE:X-ELNK-Trace:X-Originating-IP;
Received: from [] (helo=oemcomputer) by elasmtp-kukur.atl.sa.earthlink.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from <randy_presuhn@mindspring.com>) id 1O9Lmw-0006Ck-Jk; Tue, 04 May 2010 13:20:06 -0400
Message-ID: <003c01caebae$2bc13680$6801a8c0@oemcomputer>
From: "Randy Presuhn" <randy_presuhn@mindspring.com>
To: "LTRU Working Group" <ltru@ietf.org>, "Disman" <disman@ietf.org>, <agentx@ietf.org>
Date: Tue, 4 May 2010 10:21:00 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1478
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1478
X-ELNK-Trace: 4488c18417c9426da92b9037bc8bcf44d4c20f6b8d69d888a91fc720532780356b575111acb2aa6138e3dc2df667cb15350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c
Subject: [Ltru] Fw: resend - poll request
X-BeenThere: ltru@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Language Tag Registry Update working group discussion list <ltru.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru>, <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ltru>
List-Post: <mailto:ltru@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru>, <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 May 2010 17:22:37 -0000

Hi -

Forwarded from the working-group chairs list.


----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Scott O. Bradner" <sob@harvard.edu>
> To: <wgchairs@ietf.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, May 04, 2010 10:04 AM
> Subject: resend - poll request
> working group chairs:
> This is the resend of the pointer to the survey that I talked about
> during the WG Chairs lunch in Anaheim – sorry for the delay
> Please take a look & if you are comfortable doing so, please send a
> pointer to your WG discussion list
> Thanks
> Scott
> === resend====
> We need your support to our project that develops an open-source tool
> monitoring the status of conflicts in a virtual working group (WG).
> This tool will be particular well suited to monitoring conflict
> resolution in IETF WGs as well as post mortem analysis of past WGs. Its
> goal is to automatically analyze IETF WG discussion archives to
> determine the amount of conflict and how effective this conflict is
> being (has been) resolved.  As the first step, we need to understand the
> relationship between the conflicts in a working group and the structure
> of the communication network in that group. While having conflicts is
> not necessarily a bad thing for a team, some conflicts could be
> escalated into disasters. We are interested in finding the communication
> patterns related to the evolution of group conflicts. Results from this
> study will provide the base for the development of the tool that helps
> working group chairs to decide when to intervene with an internal
> conflict before it becomes irreversibly negative as well as being a tool
> that may help determine where there is consensus on a particular topic.
> We would like your help in understanding the level of conflicts within
> your working groups and how the conflicts affect productivity and group
> members’ perception on the working group. It will be greatly appreciated
> if you could ask your WG members to anonymously fill a short survey at
> https://spreadsheets.google.com/viewform?hl=en&formkey=dExTbEU5QmRncnhFbjhQUVR4bzBGMEE6MA
> Thank you!
> Best Regards,
> Bin Zhu, Mark Gaynor, Scott Bradner, and Jialun Qin