[Ltru] Region subtag changes

John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org> Wed, 20 September 2006 12:35 UTC

Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GQ1IK-00051B-Uo; Wed, 20 Sep 2006 08:35:16 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GQ1IK-000515-61 for ltru@ietf.org; Wed, 20 Sep 2006 08:35:16 -0400
Received: from mercury.ccil.org ([192.190.237.100]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GQ1II-00082r-W1 for ltru@ietf.org; Wed, 20 Sep 2006 08:35:16 -0400
Received: from cowan by mercury.ccil.org with local (Exim 4.34) id 1GQ1II-0007EX-Jd; Wed, 20 Sep 2006 08:35:14 -0400
Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2006 08:35:14 -0400
To: Doug Ewell <dewell@adelphia.net>
Message-ID: <20060920123514.GA15905@ccil.org>
References: <E1GPg6q-0004yv-5v@megatron.ietf.org> <008601c6dbf6$8238dc00$6401a8c0@DGBP7M81> <451006C2.60603@yahoo-inc.com> <004301c6dc6d$bebab190$6401a8c0@DGBP7M81>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <004301c6dc6d$bebab190$6401a8c0@DGBP7M81>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
From: John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org>
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: d6b246023072368de71562c0ab503126
Cc: ltru@ietf.org
Subject: [Ltru] Region subtag changes
X-BeenThere: ltru@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Language Tag Registry Update working group discussion list <ltru.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru>, <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/ltru>
List-Post: <mailto:ltru@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru>, <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: ltru-bounces@ietf.org

Doug Ewell scripsit:

> I'd be interested if somebody could come up with a plausible scenario
> that would result in circular P-V assignments.

What about a country reverting to an earlier name?  We have two historical
examples I can think of offhand, Central African Republic -> Central
African Empire -> Central African Republic (which probably didn't affect
the code) and Dem. Rep. of Congo -> Zaire -> Dem. Rep. of Congo (which
did, fortunately before Date A).

We might have another someday in Burma -> Myanmar -> Burma, since the
dissidents (I believe this is correct) object to the process by which
the (Latin-script) name of the country was changed.  We already have BU
deprecated in favor of MM; if the name is changed back and the old code
is revived, we might end up with MM deprecated in favor of BU.

-- 
                Si hoc legere scis, nimium eruditionis habes.

_______________________________________________
Ltru mailing list
Ltru@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru