Re: [Ltru] Consensus call: extlang

Martin Duerst <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp> Wed, 04 June 2008 08:59 UTC

Return-Path: <ltru-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ltru-archive@megatron.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-ltru-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AEC23A6AA1; Wed, 4 Jun 2008 01:59:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: ltru@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ltru@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A3D13A6806 for <ltru@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Jun 2008 01:59:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 3.114
X-Spam-Level: ***
X-Spam-Status: No, score=3.114 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.092, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_JP=1.244, HOST_EQ_JP=1.265, J_CHICKENPOX_23=0.6, RCVD_IN_NJABL_RELAY=2.696]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id o+SD9eirkUph for <ltru@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Jun 2008 01:59:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from scmailgw1.scop.aoyama.ac.jp (scmailgw1.scop.aoyama.ac.jp [133.2.251.194]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A76163A6C91 for <ltru@ietf.org>; Wed, 4 Jun 2008 01:59:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from scmse2.scbb.aoyama.ac.jp (scmse2 [133.2.253.17]) by scmailgw1.scop.aoyama.ac.jp (secret/secret) with SMTP id m548gsZt017687 for <ltru@ietf.org>; Wed, 4 Jun 2008 17:42:56 +0900 (JST)
Received: from (133.2.206.133) by scmse2.scbb.aoyama.ac.jp via smtp id 5981_395c7824_3212_11dd_8a8c_0014221f2a2d; Wed, 04 Jun 2008 17:42:54 +0900
Received: from Tanzawa.it.aoyama.ac.jp ([133.2.210.1]:45636) by itmail.it.aoyama.ac.jp with [XMail 1.22 ESMTP Server] id <S9BD22> for <ltru@ietf.org> from <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>; Wed, 4 Jun 2008 17:37:29 +0900
Message-Id: <6.0.0.20.2.20080604152146.087cde30@localhost>
X-Sender: duerst@localhost
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6J
Date: Wed, 04 Jun 2008 15:27:03 +0900
To: Peter Constable <petercon@microsoft.com>, LTRU Working Group <ltru@ietf.org>
From: Martin Duerst <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>
In-Reply-To: <DDB6DE6E9D27DD478AE6D1BBBB8357956333680DE1@NA-EXMSG-C117.r edmond.corp.microsoft.com>
References: <01c301c8bbe5$8c2810c0$6801a8c0@oemcomputer> <6.0.0.20.2.20080527170755.05bd89c0@localhost> <002f01c8c024$0dcdb5c0$6801a8c0@oemcomputer> <6.0.0.20.2.20080528163346.074fac80@localhost> <001f01c8c122$0cbcae80$6801a8c0@oemcomputer> <4D25F22093241741BC1D0EEBC2DBB1DA013A84C314@EX-SEA5-D.ant.amazon.com> <007601c8c1bc$84d93920$6801a8c0@oemcomputer> <104f01c8c1d8$94ad6f30$0a00a8c0@CPQ86763045110> <30b660a20805291559x4f6243a8pecc7ee92c2a36d9c@mail.gmail.com> <E19FDBD7A3A7F04788F00E90915BD36C13C251B4FC@USSDIXMSG20.spe.sony.com> <30b660a20805300911j1713bff0xa7e8e468e039d42@mail.gmail.com> <1EEB09866D70AA48A93C0D9EB7237F0B014C231039@USSDIXMSG20.spe.sony.com> <008e01c8c5a7$1ba88b60$6801a8c0@oemcomputer> <4D25F22093241741BC1D0EEBC2DBB1DA013AABBD22@EX-SEA5-D.ant.amazon.com> <48459AD5.5000109@malform.no> <DDB6DE6E9D27DD478AE6D1BBBB8357956333680DE1@NA-EXMSG-C117.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [Ltru] Consensus call: extlang
X-BeenThere: ltru@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Language Tag Registry Update working group discussion list <ltru.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru>, <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/ltru>
List-Post: <mailto:ltru@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru>, <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: ltru-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ltru-bounces@ietf.org

At 11:54 08/06/04, Peter Constable wrote:

>OK, so a user selects "Cantonese" as their preference, and some apps have 
>Cantonese UI but other apps have Mandarin UI? And then when they search on 
>the Web all the results they get are in Mandarin? And they'd find that 
>acceptable?

"acceptable" is a stretchable term, in most cases. Some Cantonese
users may prefer a Mandarin UI to a UI in French or English or what
not. Given what we have heard on this list about written Cantonese
and Mandarin, it may even be that most Cantonese users would have
such a preference. For search results again, they may prefer
something relevant in Mandarin to nothing/irrelevant in Cantonese,
even though of course their top preference is relevant stuff in
Cantonese.

Regards,    Martin.


#-#-#  Martin J. Du"rst, Assoc. Professor, Aoyama Gakuin University
#-#-#  http://www.sw.it.aoyama.ac.jp       mailto:duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp     

_______________________________________________
Ltru mailing list
Ltru@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru