[Ltru] Re: Solving the UTF-8 problem

"Doug Ewell" <dewell@roadrunner.com> Tue, 03 July 2007 06:00 UTC

Return-path: <ltru-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1I5bRG-0003J8-B7; Tue, 03 Jul 2007 02:00:38 -0400
Received: from ltru by megatron.ietf.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1I5bRF-0003Ir-Dp for ltru-confirm+ok@megatron.ietf.org; Tue, 03 Jul 2007 02:00:37 -0400
Received: from [] (helo=chiedprmail1.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1I5bRF-0003Id-1y for ltru@ietf.org; Tue, 03 Jul 2007 02:00:37 -0400
Received: from mta9.adelphia.net ([]) by chiedprmail1.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1I5bRE-00022j-R9 for ltru@ietf.org; Tue, 03 Jul 2007 02:00:36 -0400
Received: from DGBP7M81 ([]) by mta9.adelphia.net (InterMail vM. 201-2131-123-102-20050715) with SMTP id <20070703060004.RSQW6326.mta9.adelphia.net@DGBP7M81>; Tue, 3 Jul 2007 02:00:04 -0400
Message-ID: <000701c7bd37$65947eb0$6401a8c0@DGBP7M81>
From: Doug Ewell <dewell@roadrunner.com>
To: LTRU Working Group <ltru@ietf.org>, ietf-languages@iana.org
References: <006501c7bc33$637b08b0$6401a8c0@DGBP7M81> <20070702201555.GA17967@sources.org>
Date: Mon, 02 Jul 2007 23:00:01 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format="flowed"; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type="original"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.3138
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3138
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: e5ba305d0e64821bf3d8bc5d3bb07228
Subject: [Ltru] Re: Solving the UTF-8 problem
X-BeenThere: ltru@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Language Tag Registry Update working group discussion list <ltru.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru>, <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/ltru>
List-Post: <mailto:ltru@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru>, <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: ltru-bounces@ietf.org

Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer at nic dot fr> wrote:

>> 3.  UTF-8 can't be read on some, espcially older, computer systems (Frank 
>> Ellermann, months ago, and CE Whitehead).
> So, I basically agree that UTF-8 for the registry is better but I do not 
> want to see bold sentences like "Anyone but Frank Ellermann can run a full 
> UTF-8 environment by now". This is not true.

You're correct.  I restated three objections to converting the Registry to 
UTF-8, and tried to show why they don't outweigh the advantages of 
converting.  All three are, in fact, true:

1.  UTF-8 doesn't play well with e-mail.
2.  Converting will break processors that expect only ASCII.
3.  Some computers can't display UTF-8.

But we can work out the e-mail problem, and the breakage to processors is no 
worse than adding new fields (nor are there that many fully-conformant 
processors to be fixed).  And the display problem is really not as much of a 
showstopper as it is being portrayed.  People are saying that the hex 
escapes are a display problem too, and adding "Arua" and "Aru&#xE1; (Arua)" 
to the Registry is going to confuse a LOT of people, no matter how many 
comments we add.

Doug Ewell  *  Fullerton, California, USA  *  RFC 4645  *  UTN #14

Ltru mailing list