IETF Logo Mail Archive

RE: [Ltru] Re: action item: "other" collections in 639

Peter Constable <petercon@microsoft.com> Thu, 29 November 2007 16:04 UTC

Return-path: <ltru-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ixlso-0008Bb-Sz; Thu, 29 Nov 2007 11:04:58 -0500
Received: from ltru by megatron.ietf.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1Ixlsn-0008BD-9o for ltru-confirm+ok@megatron.ietf.org; Thu, 29 Nov 2007 11:04:57 -0500
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ixlsn-0008B4-0B for ltru@lists.ietf.org; Thu, 29 Nov 2007 11:04:57 -0500
Received: from maila.microsoft.com ([131.107.115.212] helo=smtp.microsoft.com) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ixlsm-0006gs-Jj for ltru@lists.ietf.org; Thu, 29 Nov 2007 11:04:56 -0500
Received: from tk1-exhub-c102.redmond.corp.microsoft.com (157.56.116.113) by TK5-EXGWY-E801.partners.extranet.microsoft.com (10.251.56.50) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.1.222.3; Thu, 29 Nov 2007 08:04:23 -0800
Received: from NA-EXMSG-C117.redmond.corp.microsoft.com ([157.54.62.44]) by tk1-exhub-c102.redmond.corp.microsoft.com ([157.56.116.113]) with mapi; Thu, 29 Nov 2007 08:04:56 -0800
From: Peter Constable <petercon@microsoft.com>
To: "ltru@lists.ietf.org" <ltru@lists.ietf.org>
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2007 08:04:54 -0800
Subject: RE: [Ltru] Re: action item: "other" collections in 639
Thread-Topic: [Ltru] Re: action item: "other" collections in 639
Thread-Index: Acgym+3H/o25nJAIQoO12QwZqCfHAQABY5+g
Message-ID: <DDB6DE6E9D27DD478AE6D1BBBB83579561B42BB8E3@NA-EXMSG-C117.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
References: <E1IxWtu-0007Mu-3s@megatron.ietf.org><003d01c83254$ddd0cef0$6601a8c0@DGBP7M81> <DDB6DE6E9D27DD478AE6D1BBBB83579561B42BB874@NA-EXMSG-C117.redmond.corp.microsoft.com> <fimli5$lip$1@ger.gmane.org>
In-Reply-To: <fimli5$lip$1@ger.gmane.org>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Spam-Score: -8.0 (--------)
X-Scan-Signature: 08e48e05374109708c00c6208b534009
Cc:
X-BeenThere: ltru@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Language Tag Registry Update working group discussion list <ltru.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru>, <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/ltru>
List-Post: <mailto:ltru@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru>, <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============2055873838=="
Errors-To: ltru-bounces@ietf.org

> From: Frank Ellermann [mailto:nobody@xyzzy.claranet.de]

> > I've suggested in the past that removing collection IDs from
> > BCP47 might not be a bad idea, but on several occasions people
> > have indicated that they wish to have the collections kept.
>
> "Removing" can't fly.  Do you mean "not add new" (in the 4645bis
> bulk update), "deprecate old", or both ?

Deprecate, and not add new.


Peter

_______________________________________________
Ltru mailing list
Ltru@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email