Re: [Ltru] Re: Registry change of the day: prefix with more than one subtag

John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org> Tue, 10 July 2007 06:26 UTC

Return-path: <ltru-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1I89BV-0007ym-1O; Tue, 10 Jul 2007 02:26:53 -0400
Received: from ltru by megatron.ietf.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1I89BT-0007yg-Ju for ltru-confirm+ok@megatron.ietf.org; Tue, 10 Jul 2007 02:26:51 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1I89BT-0007yY-8L for ltru@ietf.org; Tue, 10 Jul 2007 02:26:51 -0400
Received: from earth.ccil.org ([192.190.237.11]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1I89BP-00015N-0S for ltru@ietf.org; Tue, 10 Jul 2007 02:26:51 -0400
Received: from cowan by earth.ccil.org with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from <cowan@ccil.org>) id 1I89BO-0007oy-PK; Tue, 10 Jul 2007 02:26:46 -0400
Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 02:26:46 -0400
To: Doug Ewell <dewell@roadrunner.com>
Subject: Re: [Ltru] Re: Registry change of the day: prefix with more than one subtag
Message-ID: <20070710062646.GD4426@mercury.ccil.org>
References: <E1I7Chz-0004HK-Kx@megatron.ietf.org> <006501c7c2b7$126dd4e0$6401a8c0@DGBP7M81>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <006501c7c2b7$126dd4e0$6401a8c0@DGBP7M81>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11)
From: John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org>
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 79899194edc4f33a41f49410777972f8
Cc: ltru@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ltru@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Language Tag Registry Update working group discussion list <ltru.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru>, <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/ltru>
List-Post: <mailto:ltru@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru>, <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: ltru-bounces@ietf.org

Doug Ewell scripsit:

> What information is available in either RFC 4646(bis) or in the Registry 
> that would help software to make this decision?  Does a prefix of 
> "language with no variant" mean that the variant should not be used in 
> the presence of any other variant?  How does one determine that 
> "en-scouse-fonipa" is OK while "el-monoton-fonipa" is not?

I think there is no hope of getting this right automatically.  The
Prefix: field gives some guidance, but even it is only a SHOULD.
That said, people who use multiple prefixes probably wouldn't bother
unless they know what they are doing.  Indeed, the same can be
said of most kinds of generativity.

-- 
John Cowan    cowan@ccil.org    http://ccil.org/~cowan
   There was an old man                Said with a laugh, "I
     From Peru, whose lim'ricks all      Cut them in half, the pay is
       Look'd like haiku.  He              Much better for two."
                                             --Emmet O'Brien


_______________________________________________
Ltru mailing list
Ltru@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru