Re: [Ltru] Consensus call: extlang

Nicolas Krebs <nicolas1.krebs3@netcourrier.com> Thu, 22 May 2008 22:15 UTC

Return-Path: <ltru-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ltru-archive@megatron.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-ltru-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CE2F3A6A58; Thu, 22 May 2008 15:15:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: ltru@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ltru@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE13F3A68AC for <ltru@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 22 May 2008 15:15:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id af3LX95Ws10U for <ltru@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 22 May 2008 15:15:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from relay-2.mailobj.net (relay-2.mailobj.net [195.234.90.137]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C95BC3A6941 for <ltru@ietf.org>; Thu, 22 May 2008 15:15:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from netcourrier.com (webmail-1.in.mailobj.net [192.168.90.138]) by relay-2.mailobj.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 45DCB1511F8 for <ltru@ietf.org>; Fri, 23 May 2008 00:13:40 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [89.2.243.42] by webmail-1.netcourrier.com via html interface
From: Nicolas Krebs <nicolas1.krebs3@netcourrier.com>
To: ltru@ietf.org
Date: Fri, 23 May 2008 00:13:37 +0200
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Medianet/v2.0
Message-Id: <mnet1.1211494417.7439.nicolas1.krebs3@netcourrier.com>
Subject: Re: [Ltru] Consensus call: extlang
X-BeenThere: ltru@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Language Tag Registry Update working group discussion list <ltru.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru>, <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/ltru>
List-Post: <mailto:ltru@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru>, <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: ltru-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ltru-bounces@ietf.org

Randy Presuhn wrote 

>Hi -

Hello, 

>As co-chair...
>
>Later in this message I will be asking some questions.  Please
>respond to this mailing list so that the co-chairs can decide
>what to instruct the editors to do regarding the general disposition
>(*not* detailed wordsmithing!) of the extlang question.

>Q1: The current draft (http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-ltru-4646bis-14.txt)
>    does away with the "extlang" production. Possible responses: (pick ONE)
>        A - I like this.
>        B - I can live with this.
>        C - I object to this.   
>
>Q2: We could go back to using "extlang" in the grammar, requiring its
>    use for representing "encompassed" languages that are being added.
>    Possible responses:  (pick ONE)
>        A - I would like this.
>        B - I could live with this.
>        C - I would object to this.


Q1 B

Q2 B



_______________________________________________
Ltru mailing list
Ltru@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru