[Ltru] Last open item

"Mark Davis" <mark.davis@icu-project.org> Thu, 10 April 2008 19:52 UTC

Return-Path: <ltru-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ltru-archive@megatron.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-ltru-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from core3.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52A063A6A4B; Thu, 10 Apr 2008 12:52:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: ltru@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ltru@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3F553A6A4B for <ltru@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 10 Apr 2008 12:52:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.976
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.976 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id myo1Q709otMZ for <ltru@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 10 Apr 2008 12:51:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ik-out-1112.google.com (ik-out-1112.google.com [66.249.90.181]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C02E23A6991 for <ltru@ietf.org>; Thu, 10 Apr 2008 12:51:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by ik-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id c28so136765ika.5 for <ltru@ietf.org>; Thu, 10 Apr 2008 12:52:19 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:x-google-sender-auth; bh=ILKmT0l+h8ym+t+GtHf8ue+hti5RYwPiwozPD40lmKU=; b=UFz4OMYIrG6MRdFF6iXjPy9tPUgEnDAtt7XCWSx8DuoVlEgm79LCNE7tXLQyuRArlxdJd8S2sdKE5F3z+uetmE+wbWV2AeJ5OUSnGNs7OJ2H/16K2qhM6Xlvdtis9ElnVogfjRNJi/5uO3T8BshVEJJHD0TAqTBzsd7q0nZb8cc=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:x-google-sender-auth; b=Xu7IJBpPXb6gKw0bEiGQA/WCYIAkf15iasFHVtveBX/8adMuMI51wyzxvpw2bZzEtQz4LjhI2sCqrv3LXPmeFqD82iU9IMtFOqu3SJFwnWlazzWPG1XgzGAJsIYX9ba6apinmWsHlAqY5HecKdA60iuKGB6g1QbhuhKfj1Nw+CQ=
Received: by 10.150.215.17 with SMTP id n17mr2267596ybg.14.1207857138283; Thu, 10 Apr 2008 12:52:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.150.229.9 with HTTP; Thu, 10 Apr 2008 12:52:18 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <30b660a20804101252p37e22884g6dfbec6dd17e5ea1@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2008 12:52:18 -0700
From: Mark Davis <mark.davis@icu-project.org>
To: LTRU Working Group <ltru@ietf.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Google-Sender-Auth: 073c4b79a042b0fa
Subject: [Ltru] Last open item
X-BeenThere: ltru@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Language Tag Registry Update working group discussion list <ltru.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru>, <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/ltru>
List-Post: <mailto:ltru@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru>, <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0149720570=="
Sender: ltru-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ltru-bounces@ietf.org

I went through all the pending comments to see which didn't have objections
raised on the list. The only open substantive issue I think we have left is
about whether to change the following lines:

The field 'Preferred-Value' MUST NOT be modified once created in the
registry. The field MAY be added to records according to the rules in
Section 3.3 (Maintenance of the
Registry)<http://www.inter-locale.com/ID/draft-ietf-ltru-4646bis-13.html#maintreg>
.

*(note: we don't have a similar phrase for Deprecated)*

Values in the fields 'Type', 'Subtag', 'Tag', 'Added', 'Deprecated' and
'Preferred-Value' MUST NOT be changed and are guaranteed to be stable over
time.

Here is my reasoning. We can't guarantee complete stability over time.
Whenever Deprecated or Preferred-Value are added, it changes the canonical
form; or if the target of a Preferred-Value is itself deprecated. Currently
if a subtag is deprecated in a source standard in favor of another, nothing
special needs to be done unless:

   1. there is a collision - the same subtag with a different meaning
   (like CS), OR
   2. the preferred subtag is an older deprecated code (eg BU => MM =>
   BU), OR
   3. the target of the Preferred-Value itself becomes deprecated (we
   want to resolve it so that users don't have to).

In the first 2 cases, we are forced to use a "special" code, eg change MM to
104. That's perfectly fine in the case of collisions (#1). However, it is
completely unnecessary in the case of older deprecated codes. So my proposal
is to change the above lines to drop the first one, and change the second
to:

Values in the fields 'Type', 'Subtag', 'Tag', and 'Added' MUST NOT be
changed and are guaranteed to be stable over time. Values in the
'Deprecated' and 'Preferred-Value' MUST NOT be changed unless the tag or
subtag in the Preferred-Value field is itself deprecated, or if a
deprecation is reversed in one of the source standards.

-- 
Mark
_______________________________________________
Ltru mailing list
Ltru@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru