Re: [Ltru] RFC 3282 revision

Hello Alexey,

Thanks for this pointer. I intend to contact the YAM-WG about my proposal to review 3282.

Addison

Addison Phillips
Globalization Architect -- Lab126

Internationalization is not a feature.
It is an architecture.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: ltru-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:ltru-bounces@ietf.org] On
> Behalf Of Alexey Melnikov
> Sent: Tuesday, August 18, 2009 11:46 AM
> To: ltru@ietf.org
> Subject: [Ltru] RFC 3282 revision
> 
> Hi,
> I've just noticed a recent discussion on the mailing list about
> revising
> RFC 3282.
> I should point out that there is actually another WG trying to
> advance
> this document to Full Standard. This WG is called YAM
> <http://www.ietf.org/dyn/wg/charter/yam-charter.html>.
> 
> As an AD I welcome energy surrounding revision of RFC 3282. But
> please
> coordinate with the YAM WG. Otherwise if I get 2 versions of the
> document (one from participants of this WG and one from YAM), I
> would
> have to pick one ;-).
> 
> Best Regards,
> Alexey
> 
> P.S. There was a discussion in YAM meeting in Stockholm about how
> widespread is the use of Content-Language with
> multipart/alternative.
> Does anybody know which email/web clients support that?
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Ltru mailing list
> Ltru@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru