IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Ltru] Charter Discussion

"Mark Davis" <mark.davis@icu-project.org> Thu, 22 June 2006 15:26 UTC

Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FtR4I-0000CI-S9; Thu, 22 Jun 2006 11:26:06 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FtR4H-0000CD-Nz for ltru@ietf.org; Thu, 22 Jun 2006 11:26:05 -0400
Received: from wr-out-0506.google.com ([64.233.184.228]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FtR4G-0001hv-FW for ltru@ietf.org; Thu, 22 Jun 2006 11:26:05 -0400
Received: by wr-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id i23so408309wra for <ltru@ietf.org>; Thu, 22 Jun 2006 08:26:04 -0700 (PDT)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=JUXb4qmdtCHqWtCjnqkjwXnS17mycMn+Lyok14QccPq5Xl4/XUkZBrFmoFd1ivs6A7QSOuj+mCmcZGwCrDcbuheW/uVALD+Z2pvmxDxuM+bvOHM0Sx/7B1jWyrPDrrsg5AJW4Sc25DnFfgfCsbnE8ZrJFvJr0AZo/GIoMLyGbGY=
Received: by 10.65.219.7 with SMTP id w7mr1498081qbq; Thu, 22 Jun 2006 08:26:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.65.148.20 with HTTP; Thu, 22 Jun 2006 08:26:03 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <30b660a20606220826n72b9b3dco5808ff268b0ca4a9@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2006 08:26:03 -0700
From: Mark Davis <mark.davis@icu-project.org>
To: Peter Constable <petercon@microsoft.com>
Subject: Re: [Ltru] Charter Discussion
In-Reply-To: <F8ACB1B494D9734783AAB114D0CE68FE0A1C65C3@RED-MSG-52.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <004c01c6954e$5d862d20$650a0a0a@ds.corp.yahoo.com> <F8ACB1B494D9734783AAB114D0CE68FE0A1C65C3@RED-MSG-52.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
X-Google-Sender-Auth: 3bcd4415541ac353
X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 769a46790fb42fbb0b0cc700c82f7081
Cc: ltru@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ltru@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Language Tag Registry Update working group discussion list <ltru.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru>, <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/ltru>
List-Post: <mailto:ltru@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru>, <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0739284084=="
Errors-To: ltru-bounces@ietf.org

+1

On 6/21/06, Peter Constable <petercon@microsoft.com> wrote:
>
> > From: Addison Phillips [mailto:addison@yahoo-inc.com]
> > Sent: Wednesday, June 21, 2006 9:19 AM
>
> > I see merit in limiting the scope of a revision to 3066bis. We have
> > struggled long and mightily to produce 3066bis. There are very few
> changes
> > necessary to incorporate ISO 639-3, which is the reason for producing a
> > revision. Any additional things we might undertake would need to be
> really
> > compelling in order for me to support them.
>
> +1
>
> The relative importance to incorporate ISO 639-3 over implementation of
> ISO 11179 is, IMO, a couple of orders of magnitude.
>
>
>
> Peter Constable
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ltru mailing list
> Ltru@ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru
>

_______________________________________________
Ltru mailing list
Ltru@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru

v2.27.6 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status