IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Ltru] Re: Test suite for language tags?

Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr> Tue, 29 August 2006 11:32 UTC

Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GI1pG-0001md-DP; Tue, 29 Aug 2006 07:32:14 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GI1pF-0001mQ-5z for ltru@ietf.org; Tue, 29 Aug 2006 07:32:13 -0400
Received: from stsc1260-eth-s1-s1p1-vip.va.neustar.com ([156.154.16.129] helo=chiedprmail1.ietf.org) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GHzw6-00050E-R2 for ltru@ietf.org; Tue, 29 Aug 2006 05:31:10 -0400
Received: from mx2.nic.fr ([192.134.4.11]) by chiedprmail1.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GHzoG-0003Kt-Cb for ltru@ietf.org; Tue, 29 Aug 2006 05:23:06 -0400
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mx2.nic.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2672726C156; Tue, 29 Aug 2006 11:22:59 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from relay1.nic.fr (relay1.nic.fr [192.134.4.162]) by mx2.nic.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id E962526C11F; Tue, 29 Aug 2006 11:22:57 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from bortzmeyer.nic.fr (batilda.nic.fr [192.134.4.69]) by relay1.nic.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5CD6A1D93E; Tue, 29 Aug 2006 11:22:57 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 11:22:57 +0200
From: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
To: Addison Phillips <addison@yahoo-inc.com>
Message-ID: <20060829092257.GA22927@nic.fr>
References: <E1G8H4g-00035u-Ej@megatron.ietf.org> <001d01c6b78a$07b37890$040aa8c0@DGBP7M81> <44D36598.1020304@yahoo-inc.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <44D36598.1020304@yahoo-inc.com>
X-Operating-System: Debian GNU/Linux 3.1
X-Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-2-686 i686
Organization: NIC France
X-URL: http://www.nic.fr/
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at mx2.nic.fr
X-Spam-Score: -2.4 (--)
X-Scan-Signature: 08170828343bcf1325e4a0fb4584481c
Cc: Doug Ewell <dewell@adelphia.net>, LTRU Working Group <ltru@ietf.org>
Subject: [Ltru] Re: Test suite for language tags?
X-BeenThere: ltru@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Language Tag Registry Update working group discussion list <ltru.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru>, <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/ltru>
List-Post: <mailto:ltru@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru>, <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: ltru-bounces@ietf.org

On Fri, Aug 04, 2006 at 08:19:52AM -0700,
 Addison Phillips <addison@yahoo-inc.com> wrote 
 a message of 50 lines which said:

> Agreed: all RFC 3066bis processors have to have the list of
> grandfathered tags baked in.

Does it mean that a processor should (ordinary "should" not RFC
"SHOULD") define the grammar production "grandfathered" as a list of
possible grandfathered tags, rather than the grammar rules expressed
in draft-ietf-ltru-registry-14?

I ask the question because these rules accept things like "fr-Lat"
which is not a well-formed tag. So, I was planning to replace them by
a hardwired list of GF tags.

_______________________________________________
Ltru mailing list
Ltru@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email