[Ltru] Re: Review of 4646bis-10, sections 3.5 to App. B
John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org> Fri, 14 December 2007 20:58 UTC
Return-path: <ltru-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1J3HcK-0006D8-53; Fri, 14 Dec 2007 15:58:44 -0500
Received: from ltru by megatron.ietf.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1J3HcJ-00068z-6Z for ltru-confirm+ok@megatron.ietf.org; Fri, 14 Dec 2007 15:58:43 -0500
Received: from [10.90.34.44] (helo=chiedprmail1.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1J3HcI-00065n-Pw for ltru@ietf.org; Fri, 14 Dec 2007 15:58:42 -0500
Received: from earth.ccil.org ([192.190.237.11]) by chiedprmail1.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1J3HcI-00020U-AX for ltru@ietf.org; Fri, 14 Dec 2007 15:58:42 -0500
Received: from cowan by earth.ccil.org with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from <cowan@ccil.org>) id 1J3HcI-0003PH-0z for ltru@ietf.org; Fri, 14 Dec 2007 15:58:42 -0500
Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2007 15:58:42 -0500
To: ltru@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20071214205841.GK15079@mercury.ccil.org>
References: <20071207213756.GC3346@mercury.ccil.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20071207213756.GC3346@mercury.ccil.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11)
From: John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org>
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: fb6060cb60c0cea16e3f7219e40a0a81
Subject: [Ltru] Re: Review of 4646bis-10, sections 3.5 to App. B
X-BeenThere: ltru@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Language Tag Registry Update working group discussion list <ltru.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru>, <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/ltru>
List-Post: <mailto:ltru@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru>, <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: ltru-bounces@ietf.org
Scripsi: > Here's the rest of my review, except for the macrolanguage section of 4.1, > which is in a separate posting. Only a few of these changes made it in to -11 either. 3.5: s/all other fields/any other fields/. 3.5: remove single-sentence graf about extended language subtags. 3.5: draft has both "publicly" and "publically" in different places; both are orthographically acceptable, but pick one and stick to it. 3.5: s/language is registered/language is already registered/. 3.8: rename section to "Replacement of the Language Subtag Registry"; s/update/replacement/; s/updated/replacement/. 3.8: s/Once published/Once the registry is published/. 4.1: s/Sometimes there is a choice/There is always a choice/, which is much nearer the truth. 4.1: s/thus not be selected/thus will not be selected/. 4.1: s/zh-cmn/cmn/ (twice). 4.4: The definition of "canonical form" here shouldn't have MUSTard in it; a definition is just a definition and shouldn't have any modal verbs. Point 2, s/SHOULD be/are/. Point 3, /MUST be/are/. Point 4, same as 3. 4.5: suggested rewrite of grafs 1-3: The value and semantic meaning of private use tags and of the subtags used within such a language tag are not defined by this document. Like all other subtags, they MUST conform to the format and content constraints in the ABNF. They have no meaning outside the private agreement between the parties that intend to use or exchange language tags that employ them, and so are are simply useless for information exchange without prior arrangement. The same subtags MAY be used with a different meaning under a separate private agreement. They SHOULD NOT be used where alternatives exist and SHOULD NOT be used in content or protocols intended for general use. However, a language tag which combines private use subtags with other subtags conveys more information that a purely private use tag prefixed by the singleton subtag 'x'. For some applications, this additional information MAY be useful. 5.1: s/update the registry/replace the existing registry in its entirety/. 7: s/rendering engines sometimes use/rendering engines MAY use/. 8 [record-jar]: add "chapter 5". [This one is reworded] Appendix B: divide final section into "Some Invalid Tags" and "Some Ill-Formed Tags". My suggestions for invalid tags are xxx-Defg-HQ, en-nedis, (which may become valid at some future time), de-1996-1996, and ar-a-aaa-b-bbb-a-ccc. My suggestions for ill-formed tags are de-419-DE, en-nuspelling, a-de, and perhaps a few more. -- John Cowan http://ccil.org/~cowan cowan@ccil.org In might the Feanorians / that swore the unforgotten oath brought war into Arvernien / with burning and with broken troth. and Elwing from her fastness dim / then cast her in the waters wide, but like a mew was swiftly borne, / uplifted o'er the roaring tide. --the Earendillinwe _______________________________________________ Ltru mailing list Ltru@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru
- [Ltru] Review of 4646bis-10, sections 3.5 to App.… John Cowan
- [Ltru] Re: Review of 4646bis-10, sections 3.5 to … Frank Ellermann
- [Ltru] Re: Review of 4646bis-10, sections 3.5 to … Doug Ewell
- [Ltru] Re: Review of 4646bis-10, sections 3.5 to … Frank Ellermann
- [Ltru] Re: Review of 4646bis-10, sections 3.5 to … Stephane Bortzmeyer
- [Ltru] Re: Review of 4646bis-10, sections 3.5 to … Frank Ellermann
- [Ltru] Re: Review of 4646bis-10, sections 3.5 to … Doug Ewell
- Re: [Ltru] Re: Review of 4646bis-10, sections 3.5… John Cowan
- Re: [Ltru] Re: Review of 4646bis-10, sections 3.5… John Cowan
- [Ltru] Re: Review of 4646bis-10, sections 3.5 to … Frank Ellermann
- [Ltru] Re: Review of 4646bis-10, sections 3.5 to … Frank Ellermann
- Re: [Ltru] Re: Review of 4646bis-10, sections 3.5… John Cowan
- [Ltru] Re: Review of 4646bis-10, sections 3.5 to … Doug Ewell
- [Ltru] Re: Montenegrin what-if Doug Ewell
- [Ltru] Re: Review of 4646bis-10, sections 3.5 to … Frank Ellermann
- Re: [Ltru] Re: Review of 4646bis-10, sections 3.5… Martin Duerst
- Re: [Ltru] Re: Review of 4646bis-10, sections 3.5… John Cowan
- Re: [Ltru] Re: Review of 4646bis-10, sections 3.5… Mark Davis
- [Ltru] Re: Review of 4646bis-10, sections 3.5 to … Stephane Bortzmeyer
- [Ltru] Re: Review of 4646bis-10, sections 3.5 to … Frank Ellermann
- Re: [Ltru] Re: Review of 4646bis-10, sections 3.5… Martin Duerst
- Re: [Ltru] Re: Review of 4646bis-10, sections 3.5… John Cowan
- [Ltru] Re: Review of 4646bis-10, sections 3.5 to … John Cowan