Re: [Ltru] Fw: draft-davis-t-langtag-ext

Mark Davis ☕ <mark@macchiato.com> Wed, 31 August 2011 21:36 UTC

Return-Path: <mark.edward.davis@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ltru@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ltru@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3976F21F89BA for <ltru@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 31 Aug 2011 14:36:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.516
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.516 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.276, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_FONT_FACE_BAD=0.884, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XrADYTVq4zgv for <ltru@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 31 Aug 2011 14:36:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-gy0-f172.google.com (mail-gy0-f172.google.com [209.85.160.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 262D321F8E35 for <ltru@ietf.org>; Wed, 31 Aug 2011 14:36:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by gyf3 with SMTP id 3so1160174gyf.31 for <ltru@ietf.org>; Wed, 31 Aug 2011 14:37:52 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=9q3D4zUasO6Zmxj90w815F4KO0ouc5+1v/R5KCRJGG8=; b=tpwQOmhYGmuH3HWiUOkpUBS8c82PWj7N0rlkBeiWqwQDiFBhca/mfWTbKDFuIlExyT d9zMWBXOuv7Vmw3/HJJbZk/y9W1B1GbuJVanDq0aPrUHZH/JpKGEP7wSj3zcBl3xy0qT rbmiBs8DBYQdQnvyxZKW7QgHc8NjY94vn3n2Q=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.150.115.10 with SMTP id n10mr885267ybc.16.1314826672064; Wed, 31 Aug 2011 14:37:52 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: mark.edward.davis@gmail.com
Received: by 10.151.27.12 with HTTP; Wed, 31 Aug 2011 14:37:52 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <OF187CE637.C51B9821-ON852578FD.001445BA-852578FD.0014A58E@lotus.com>
References: <OF187CE637.C51B9821-ON852578FD.001445BA-852578FD.0014A58E@lotus.com>
Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2011 14:37:52 -0700
X-Google-Sender-Auth: VPtiE6jghrSJlH6O8XxqFqDPjxw
Message-ID: <CAJ2xs_F8pfJjSbrtsT27yyEWCcXg61_22mbC1tOu_jhDCwmNBA@mail.gmail.com>
From: =?UTF-8?B?TWFyayBEYXZpcyDimJU=?= <mark@macchiato.com>
To: yoshito_umaoka@us.ibm.com
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000e0cd4cbe6baca4004abd3f0ab
Cc: ltru@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Ltru] Fw: draft-davis-t-langtag-ext
X-BeenThere: ltru@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Language Tag Registry Update working group discussion list <ltru.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ltru>, <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ltru>
List-Post: <mailto:ltru@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru>, <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2011 21:36:27 -0000

I agree; will update the working draft. I'll also go ahead and post that.

Thanks!

Mark
*— Il meglio è l’inimico del bene —*


On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 20:45, <yoshito_umaoka@us.ibm.com> wrote:

> Sorry,
>
> >If my interpretation is correct, Section 2.2 d should be changed to "The
> order of *the fields* in a t extension is significant" (a field consists
> from <sep> and subtags represented by 3*8alphanum).
>
> My suggestion above was wrong - I meant
>
> 1) The order of the fields in a t extension is not significant.
> 2) The order of subtags within a field is significant.
>
>
> Yoshito Umaoka
>
>
> ----- Forwarded by Yoshito Umaoka/Westford/IBM on 08/30/2011 11:41 PM -----
>
> From:        Yoshito Umaoka/Westford/IBM
> To:        Mark Davis ☕ <mark@macchiato.com>
> Cc:        Doug Ewell <doug@ewellic.org>rg>, "Gordon P. Hemsley" <
> gphemsley@gmail.com>gt;, ltru@ietf.org
> Date:        08/30/2011 11:35 PM
> Subject:        Re: [Ltru] draft-davis-t-langtag-ext
> ------------------------------
>
>
>
> Thanks for the feedback!
>
> Updated working drafts:
>
>    - *draft-davis-t-langtag-ext.html*<http://unicode.org/repos/cldr/trunk/docs/rfc/draft-davis-t-langtag-ext.html>
>    - *draft-davis-t-langtag-ext.txt*<http://unicode.org/repos/cldr/trunk/docs/rfc/draft-davis-t-langtag-ext.txt>
>    - *draft-davis-t-langtag-ext.xml*<http://unicode.org/repos/cldr/trunk/docs/rfc/draft-davis-t-langtag-ext.xml>
>
> Mark *
> — Il meglio è l’inimico del bene —*
>
>
> One thing which we may need clarification...
>
> >Section 2.2 Structure
> >
> >d. The order of the subtags in a t extension is significant (see *Section
> 2.3 (Canonicalization)*<http://unicode.org/repos/cldr/trunk/docs/rfc/draft-davis-t-langtag-ext.html#canonicalization>Canonicalization)ation).
>
> I think this line does not match 2.3 Canonicalization - because the
> referenced section says - "with the fields ordered by the separators,
> alphabetically. "
> I think we don't want to make the order of <field> significant - for
> example, assume there is a new <sep> "x0" is introduced -
>
> und-Cyrl-t-und-latn-m0-ungegn-2007-x0-foo
>
> and
>
> und-Cyrl-t-und-latn-x0-foo-m0-ungegn-2007
>
> would be equivalent (but, the canonical representation is -
> "und-Cyrl-t-und-latn-m0-ungegn-2007-x0-foo" - because field "m0-*" and
> "field "x0-*" are sorted alphabetical order).
>
> If my interpretation is correct, Section 2.2 d should be changed to "The
> order of *the fields* in a t extension is significant" (a field consists
> from <sep> and subtags represented by 3*8alphanum).
>
>
>
> Otherwise, the latest edition looks clean and ready to go.
>
> Yoshito Umaoka
>