Re: [Ltru] draft-davis-t-langtag-ext

Mark
*— Il meglio è l’inimico del bene —*

On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 03:14, "Martin J. Dürst" <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>wrote:

>
>
> On 2011/07/08 6:00, Doug Ewell wrote:
>
>> Pete Resnick<presnick at qualcomm dot com>  wrote:
>>
>
>  I'm concerned that all of the procedures for assigning field values
>> adopted in RFC 6067 are being taken as a precedent for this draft as
>> well.  The assignments are solely up to the CLDR committee, and there is
>> no public announcement or notification that a change has been made or
>> why a request was rejected.  It could be argued that the -u- mechanism
>> was really only meant for CLDR-type usage; no such argument can be made
>> for the -t- mechanism.
>>
>
> I agree with Doug.

Doug's message was older; there were changes in the draft specifically for
that afterwards; please look them over.

>
>
>  I can't find any indication of where within CLDR the list of allowable
>> values will be located.  Saying they're in core.zip is almost useless.
>> Saying they're in common/bcp47 is better, but I'd still like to know
>> what file name, what XML element, etc.  An example would help.
>>
>
> Agreed here again.
>

Ok, I'll get get specifics from the committee.

>
> Regards,   Martin.
>
> ______________________________**_________________
> Ltru mailing list
> Ltru@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/**listinfo/ltru<https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru>
>