Re: [Ltru] draft-davis-t-langtag-ext

Mark Davis ☕ <mark@macchiato.com> Thu, 21 July 2011 14:05 UTC

Return-Path: <mark.edward.davis@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ltru@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ltru@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4605C21F8B0E for <ltru@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Jul 2011 07:05:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.733
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.733 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.607, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_FONT_FACE_BAD=0.884, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, SARE_HTML_USL_OBFU=1.666]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CMdfgr39DTu2 for <ltru@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Jul 2011 07:05:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yi0-f44.google.com (mail-yi0-f44.google.com [209.85.218.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C48E21F866A for <ltru@ietf.org>; Thu, 21 Jul 2011 07:05:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by yie30 with SMTP id 30so722132yie.31 for <ltru@ietf.org>; Thu, 21 Jul 2011 07:05:03 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=0X5Vcxbo6CRXBSYM+l3U0b5wsmCpowtSZiW/7I45S3I=; b=uVTD0QWgAz0VrY0lw16KZlKNuGd8xo6dOj98KtYy+KaYDtGxhWtrtXyGK3w+AmF+0A GQQJcvGBd5gPYdpseyDr/fJ/MbYoDN6M8lAiimyAJGHnr8r3uw1NRhtXHqLNA0r0kHGV Rn5HjCm7xNb6CmS8L0LPY8jK0bgtJ6LXuTGSY=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.150.63.21 with SMTP id l21mr696130yba.364.1311257103093; Thu, 21 Jul 2011 07:05:03 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: mark.edward.davis@gmail.com
Received: by 10.151.83.9 with HTTP; Thu, 21 Jul 2011 07:05:00 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <4E27FC02.2000101@it.aoyama.ac.jp>
References: <20110707140047.665a7a7059d7ee80bb4d670165c8327d.487d506b5f.wbe@email03.secureserver.net> <4E27FC02.2000101@it.aoyama.ac.jp>
Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2011 07:05:00 -0700
X-Google-Sender-Auth: ZBaNHwBABCynjGNK2lygP_vfhe0
Message-ID: <CAJ2xs_F6jK0XUze5VotxO57dVLb95rCQCH_q10nXPJ4P61oZuw@mail.gmail.com>
From: =?UTF-8?B?TWFyayBEYXZpcyDimJU=?= <mark@macchiato.com>
To: =?UTF-8?Q?Martin_J=2E_D=C3=BCrst?= <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000e0cd48f0ad6d05b04a894d5c0
Cc: ietf-languages@iana.org, ltru@ietf.org, Doug Ewell <doug@ewellic.org>
Subject: Re: [Ltru] draft-davis-t-langtag-ext
X-BeenThere: ltru@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Language Tag Registry Update working group discussion list <ltru.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ltru>, <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ltru>
List-Post: <mailto:ltru@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru>, <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2011 14:05:04 -0000

Mark
*— Il meglio è l’inimico del bene —*


On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 03:14, "Martin J. Dürst" <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>wrote;wrote:

>
>
> On 2011/07/08 6:00, Doug Ewell wrote:
>
>> Pete Resnick<presnick at qualcomm dot com>  wrote:
>>
>
>  I'm concerned that all of the procedures for assigning field values
>> adopted in RFC 6067 are being taken as a precedent for this draft as
>> well.  The assignments are solely up to the CLDR committee, and there is
>> no public announcement or notification that a change has been made or
>> why a request was rejected.  It could be argued that the -u- mechanism
>> was really only meant for CLDR-type usage; no such argument can be made
>> for the -t- mechanism.
>>
>
> I agree with Doug.


Doug's message was older; there were changes in the draft specifically for
that afterwards; please look them over.


>
>
>  I can't find any indication of where within CLDR the list of allowable
>> values will be located.  Saying they're in core.zip is almost useless.
>> Saying they're in common/bcp47 is better, but I'd still like to know
>> what file name, what XML element, etc.  An example would help.
>>
>
> Agreed here again.
>

Ok, I'll get get specifics from the committee.


>
> Regards,   Martin.
>
> ______________________________**_________________
> Ltru mailing list
> Ltru@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/**listinfo/ltru<https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru>
>