Re: [Ltru] draft-davis-t-langtag-ext

Mark Davis ☕ <mark@macchiato.com> Tue, 23 August 2011 18:31 UTC

Return-Path: <mark.edward.davis@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ltru@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ltru@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 205FF21F8AE1 for <ltru@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 23 Aug 2011 11:31:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.535
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.535 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.257, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_FONT_FACE_BAD=0.884, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PH2bGMY5nsdW for <ltru@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 23 Aug 2011 11:31:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-gy0-f172.google.com (mail-gy0-f172.google.com [209.85.160.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CE4421F8AF9 for <ltru@ietf.org>; Tue, 23 Aug 2011 11:31:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by gyf3 with SMTP id 3so370150gyf.31 for <ltru@ietf.org>; Tue, 23 Aug 2011 11:32:32 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=mxIggHmO6ohwUu2/fWB06kDhiTfGs/0jLshNFtnbuc4=; b=tQJPKP38oMbSCJTM7vPR5QL05qHB2PTolQN204z0ewENoFiuTaHdFtyOno0dh1Upgu ph0JmK7x5BornYchwr3mLMvZgInzw1ofeElok7RXiSvRD0Zwl2VpOn4fWH3bIbQqyZ/O fFgIBGt6mHNm9/GHzN0IuxbfKc4Izr9Tq/wtA=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.42.130.201 with SMTP id w9mr3963036ics.78.1314124352150; Tue, 23 Aug 2011 11:32:32 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: mark.edward.davis@gmail.com
Received: by 10.231.43.200 with HTTP; Tue, 23 Aug 2011 11:32:32 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20110823101708.665a7a7059d7ee80bb4d670165c8327d.35d98b2f35.wbe@email03.secureserver.net>
References: <20110823101708.665a7a7059d7ee80bb4d670165c8327d.35d98b2f35.wbe@email03.secureserver.net>
Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2011 11:32:32 -0700
X-Google-Sender-Auth: 9731U2zLYEn06LiD_b84gI636Yk
Message-ID: <CAJ2xs_F8QHqBBWb_R+JLoKYptGPOfG1PZa85d-OFYVbfs5iDNg@mail.gmail.com>
From: =?UTF-8?B?TWFyayBEYXZpcyDimJU=?= <mark@macchiato.com>
To: Doug Ewell <doug@ewellic.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=90e6ba212461335b8604ab306bee
Cc: ltru@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Ltru] draft-davis-t-langtag-ext
X-BeenThere: ltru@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Language Tag Registry Update working group discussion list <ltru.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ltru>, <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ltru>
List-Post: <mailto:ltru@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru>, <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2011 18:31:25 -0000

Thanks! I fixed both of those.

Updated working drafts:

   - draft-davis-t-langtag-ext.html<http://unicode.org/repos/cldr/trunk/docs/rfc/draft-davis-t-langtag-ext.html>
   - draft-davis-t-langtag-ext.txt<http://unicode.org/repos/cldr/trunk/docs/rfc/draft-davis-t-langtag-ext.txt>
   - draft-davis-t-langtag-ext.xml<http://unicode.org/repos/cldr/trunk/docs/rfc/draft-davis-t-langtag-ext.xml>


Mark
*— Il meglio è l’inimico del bene —*


On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 10:17, Doug Ewell <doug@ewellic.org> wrote:

> I've read through this document and have no significant objections.
>
> My earlier and oft-stated concerns about the data not being available
> until the document is approved have been largely satisfied; I am
> confident that the sample data in Section 2.9 will be representative of
> the real data.
>
> I'm looking forward to this extension structure becoming available for
> use in language tags.
>
> Editorial nits, neither of which should hold up approval:
>
> 1. In Section 2.5, item (a), "the mechanism subtag 'UNGEGN'" should be
> changed to "the mechanism subtag 'ungegn'", using the same casing as the
> tag which immediately follows.
>
> 2. In Section 2.9, paragraph 4, the XML structure example makes
> reference to the "collation" key from the 'u' extension, which might be
> confusing.
>
> --
> Doug Ewell | Thornton, Colorado, USA | RFC 5645, 4645, UTN #14
> www.ewellic.org | www.facebook.com/doug.ewell | @DougEwell ­
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ltru mailing list
> Ltru@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru
>