IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Ltru] Consensus call: extlang

"Randy Presuhn" <randy_presuhn@mindspring.com> Tue, 27 May 2008 04:56 UTC

Return-Path: <ltru-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ltru-archive@megatron.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-ltru-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 558B228C15D; Mon, 26 May 2008 21:56:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: ltru@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ltru@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C061728C15D for <ltru@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 26 May 2008 21:56:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.938
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.938 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.639, BAYES_00=-2.599, MANGLED_FROM=2.3]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wmrrEpUfnEiH for <ltru@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 26 May 2008 21:56:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from elasmtp-scoter.atl.sa.earthlink.net (elasmtp-scoter.atl.sa.earthlink.net [209.86.89.67]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 328AA3A6B4B for <ltru@ietf.org>; Mon, 26 May 2008 21:55:56 -0700 (PDT)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=dk20050327; d=mindspring.com; b=aza9IdYDd8/SpIvygJv1oNiXaTDOBZV+wjr7KFYmfGrz3+lJtbct/ZFYycqyQHHY; h=Received:Message-ID:From:To:References:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MimeOLE:X-ELNK-Trace:X-Originating-IP;
Received: from [69.3.146.160] (helo=oemcomputer) by elasmtp-scoter.atl.sa.earthlink.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from <randy_presuhn@mindspring.com>) id 1K0rE4-0007Lp-3Q for ltru@ietf.org; Tue, 27 May 2008 00:55:56 -0400
Message-ID: <002101c8bfb5$fd637a80$6801a8c0@oemcomputer>
From: Randy Presuhn <randy_presuhn@mindspring.com>
To: LTRU Working Group <ltru@ietf.org>
References: <01c301c8bbe5$8c2810c0$6801a8c0@oemcomputer> <008a01c8bedc$72b97b20$6801a8c0@oemcomputer> <20080526191251.GA17693@sources.org>
Date: Mon, 26 May 2008 21:56:13 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1478
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1478
X-ELNK-Trace: 4488c18417c9426da92b9037bc8bcf44d4c20f6b8d69d888a63b7957ab9b23b3cdaac16edd7c7193bb2677297532e4cf350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c
X-Originating-IP: 69.3.146.160
Subject: Re: [Ltru] Consensus call: extlang
X-BeenThere: ltru@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Language Tag Registry Update working group discussion list <ltru.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru>, <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/ltru>
List-Post: <mailto:ltru@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru>, <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: ltru-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ltru-bounces@ietf.org

Hi -

From: "Stephane Bortzmeyer" <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
To: "Randy Presuhn" <randy_presuhn@mindspring.com>
Cc: "LTRU Working Group" <ltru@ietf.org>
Sent: Monday, May 26, 2008 12:12 PM
Subject: Re: Consensus call: extlang
...
> Do note that your message in the archives is truncated
> <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ltru/current/msg10482.html>,
> probably because of the word "F r o m" at the beginning of a line.


Argh!  Here it is again, for the sake of the archives:

> From: "Randy Presuhn" <randy_presuhn@mindspring.com>
> To: "LTRU Working Group" <ltru@ietf.org>
> Sent: Sunday, May 25, 2008 7:58 PM
> Subject: Re: [Ltru] Consensus call: extlang
>
> Hi -
> 
> As WG co-chair...
> 
> Ok, I've tallied the responses.  One was sent directly to me, rather
> than to the ltru@ietf.org mailing list.  One was sent after the deadline.
> Here's the tally including those two:
> 
> Q1: A-4 B-9 C-4
> Q2: A-8 B-5 C-4
> 
> Excluding those two responses, it looks like:
> Q1: A-3 B-9 C-3
> Q2: A-7 B-5 C-3
> 
> From this I'm concluding that we have a *rough* consensus to
> "reinstate" extlang.
> 
> This was not an easy decision, and it was not undertaken lightly,
> particularly since we'd been working on the assumption that we'd
> polished of the extlang issue some months ago.
> 
> However, with equal numbers objecting to each of the proposals,
> and a 2-to-1 preference for Q2 among those favoring a proposal,
> I think the sense of the WG is clear enough for us to move on.
> 
> Randy
> ltru co-chair


_______________________________________________
Ltru mailing list
Ltru@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email