IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Ltru] Consensus call: extlang

Peter Constable <petercon@microsoft.com> Thu, 22 May 2008 22:30 UTC

Return-Path: <ltru-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ltru-archive@megatron.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-ltru-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A226B3A6B0C; Thu, 22 May 2008 15:30:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: ltru@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ltru@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 629AB28C172 for <ltru@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 22 May 2008 15:30:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.949
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.949 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.650, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id N3ZTmsTB5scN for <ltru@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 22 May 2008 15:30:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp.microsoft.com (mail1.microsoft.com [131.107.115.212]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9854428C164 for <ltru@ietf.org>; Thu, 22 May 2008 15:30:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tk5-exhub-c104.redmond.corp.microsoft.com (157.54.88.97) by TK5-EXGWY-E801.partners.extranet.microsoft.com (10.251.56.50) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.1.240.5; Thu, 22 May 2008 15:30:16 -0700
Received: from NA-EXMSG-C117.redmond.corp.microsoft.com ([157.54.62.44]) by tk5-exhub-c104.redmond.corp.microsoft.com ([157.54.88.97]) with mapi; Thu, 22 May 2008 15:30:14 -0700
From: Peter Constable <petercon@microsoft.com>
To: LTRU Working Group <ltru@ietf.org>
Date: Thu, 22 May 2008 15:30:13 -0700
Thread-Topic: [Ltru] Consensus call: extlang
Thread-Index: Aci8MXRDuQ9FXuo9Qx2T9oUICs3B/AAJXxqwAAAxxWAAAMcUYA==
Message-ID: <DDB6DE6E9D27DD478AE6D1BBBB83579562E2683FA7@NA-EXMSG-C117.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
References: <01c301c8bbe5$8c2810c0$6801a8c0@oemcomputer> <30b660a20805221029k13cdb18asf31bcb6f9fc491a1@mail.gmail.com> <DDB6DE6E9D27DD478AE6D1BBBB83579562E2683F73@NA-EXMSG-C117.redmond.corp.microsoft.com> <C9BF0238EED3634BA1866AEF14C7A9E56157008C2B@NA-EXMSG-C116.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
In-Reply-To: <C9BF0238EED3634BA1866AEF14C7A9E56157008C2B@NA-EXMSG-C116.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [Ltru] Consensus call: extlang
X-BeenThere: ltru@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Language Tag Registry Update working group discussion list <ltru.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru>, <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/ltru>
List-Post: <mailto:ltru@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru>, <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Sender: ltru-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ltru-bounces@ietf.org

Q1: B

Q2: B
I lean slightly on the C side of this question, but am very concerned that the AV media sector buys into the same tagging scheme as everyone else; if it would help to that end, I’d want it to be clear that grandfathered tags “zh-yue” etc. always remain fully legitimate.


Peter
_______________________________________________
Ltru mailing list
Ltru@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email