Re: [Ltru] Any information on SF?
"Randy Presuhn" <randy_presuhn@mindspring.com> Thu, 06 August 2009 18:30 UTC
Return-Path: <randy_presuhn@mindspring.com>
X-Original-To: ltru@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ltru@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7CAC28C177 for <ltru@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 6 Aug 2009 11:30:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.001
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HTDM8mKWzk5R for <ltru@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 6 Aug 2009 11:30:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from elasmtp-spurfowl.atl.sa.earthlink.net (elasmtp-spurfowl.atl.sa.earthlink.net [209.86.89.66]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D4BE3A6E39 for <ltru@ietf.org>; Thu, 6 Aug 2009 11:29:28 -0700 (PDT)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=dk20050327; d=mindspring.com; b=H99/yzcgj2AINygTI15UI9GmPnWv2uE2ktU6nXobJGpogXhsQ3tba5KLlTpjA6VF; h=Received:Message-ID:From:To:References:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MimeOLE:X-ELNK-Trace:X-Originating-IP;
Received: from [76.254.48.86] (helo=oemcomputer) by elasmtp-spurfowl.atl.sa.earthlink.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from <randy_presuhn@mindspring.com>) id 1MZ7iV-00080D-F2 for ltru@ietf.org; Thu, 06 Aug 2009 14:29:31 -0400
Message-ID: <001401ca16c4$286e5180$6801a8c0@oemcomputer>
From: Randy Presuhn <randy_presuhn@mindspring.com>
To: LTRU Working Group <ltru@ietf.org>
References: <30b660a20908061116w60cfe214hf4b89bf783aeedf3@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 06 Aug 2009 11:31:46 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1478
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1478
X-ELNK-Trace: 4488c18417c9426da92b9037bc8bcf44d4c20f6b8d69d88884f945684cbf69685f5e6d1c42d6bf20693d2aef2f35b4d6350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c
X-Originating-IP: 76.254.48.86
Subject: Re: [Ltru] Any information on SF?
X-BeenThere: ltru@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Language Tag Registry Update working group discussion list <ltru.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru>, <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ltru>
List-Post: <mailto:ltru@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru>, <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Aug 2009 18:30:02 -0000
Hi - As technical contributor... My suggestion would be to not worry about it. As co-chair... It's *way* too late and too unlikely to be the source of any kind of problem to open it up as an issue here. If someone thinks it would be *useful* to add it to the registry, ietf-languages@iana.org would be the place to do it. Randy ----- Original Message ----- From: "Mark Davis ⌛" <mark@macchiato.com> To: "LTRU Working Group" <ltru@ietf.org> Sent: Thursday, August 06, 2009 11:16 AM Subject: [Ltru] Any information on SF? (That's not "San Francisco" or "Science Fiction", or any confluence of the two.) We're in the process of updating to the new IANA registry, and I was cross-checking to http://www.iso.org/iso/iso-3166-1_decoding_table. The code SF stands out. *Transitionally reserved* BU Burma CS SERBIA AND MONTENEGRO NT Neutral Zone *SF Finland Not in IANA. CLDR maps to FI?? *TP East Timor YU Yugoslavia ZR Zaire I had first presumed that SF is not included because it was withdrawn before RFC1766. But SF is not even listed in http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ISO_3166-3 as a retired code. (ISO makes it exceptionally painful, as we all know, to get access to 3166-3: http://www.iso.org/iso/country_codes/background_on_iso_3166/iso_3166-3.htm). Note that http://www.iso.org/iso/iso-3166-1_decoding_table definitely has some oddities. For example, instead of "officially assigned", for two items it has "officiellement attribué". So for all we know, SF is just a mistake in that table! Does anyone know more about the code SF? For comparison, here are the "Exceptionally Reserved", two of which are obsolete codes. *Exceptionally Reserved* AC Ascension Island ok CP Clipperton Island ok DG Diego Garcia ok EA Ceuta, Melilla ok EU European Union ok *FX France, Metropolitan Deprecated in IANA: IANA maps to FR *IC Canary Islands ok *SU USSR Deprecated in IANA: CLDR maps to RU AM AZ BY EE GE KZ KG LV LT MD TJ TM UA UZ *TA Tristan da Cunha ok *UK UNITED KINGDOM Not in IANA. CLDR maps to GB* Mark -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > _______________________________________________ > Ltru mailing list > Ltru@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru >
- [Ltru] Any information on SF? Mark Davis ⌛
- Re: [Ltru] Any information on SF? Randy Presuhn
- Re: [Ltru] Any information on SF? Mark Davis ⌛
- Re: [Ltru] Any information on SF? Kent Karlsson
- Re: [Ltru] Any information on SF? Jukka K. Korpela
- Re: [Ltru] Any information on SF? John Cowan