[Ltru] Re: UTF-8

"Doug Ewell" <dewell@adelphia.net> Sat, 16 September 2006 23:34 UTC

Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GOjg1-00009A-Hd; Sat, 16 Sep 2006 19:34:25 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GOjg0-000095-11 for ltru@ietf.org; Sat, 16 Sep 2006 19:34:24 -0400
Received: from mta10.adelphia.net ([68.168.78.202]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GOjfy-0006u3-QD for ltru@ietf.org; Sat, 16 Sep 2006 19:34:24 -0400
Received: from DGBP7M81 ([68.67.66.131]) by mta10.adelphia.net (InterMail vM.6.01.05.02 201-2131-123-102-20050715) with SMTP id <20060916233422.WJGB27224.mta10.adelphia.net@DGBP7M81>; Sat, 16 Sep 2006 19:34:22 -0400
Message-ID: <00ae01c6d9e8$a3deb740$6401a8c0@DGBP7M81>
From: Doug Ewell <dewell@adelphia.net>
To: LTRU Working Group <ltru@ietf.org>
References: <E1GOfAz-0000Mm-BL@megatron.ietf.org>
Date: Sat, 16 Sep 2006 16:34:22 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format="flowed"; charset="utf-8"; reply-type="original"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2869
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2962
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 7655788c23eb79e336f5f8ba8bce7906
Cc:
Subject: [Ltru] Re: UTF-8
X-BeenThere: ltru@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Language Tag Registry Update working group discussion list <ltru.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru>, <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/ltru>
List-Post: <mailto:ltru@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru>, <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: ltru-bounces@ietf.org

Addison Phillips <addison at yahoo dash inc dot com> wrote:

>> I'm sure the logistic problems with IANA can be sorted out (e.g. 
>> using attachments).
>
> Or sending the form in escaped ASCII and telling IANA to unescape it.

<shudder />

At the very least, there would have to be an AUTH48-like period where we 
could review the end product and make corrections before it was publicly 
posted on IANA's site.

> I don't see any reason for us to dabble in transfer encodings!

No, please.

--
Doug Ewell
Fullerton, California, USA
http://users.adelphia.net/~dewell/
RFC 4645  *  UTN #14


_______________________________________________
Ltru mailing list
Ltru@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru