Re: [Ltru] Proposed -t0- subtag

"Martin J. Dürst" <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp> Thu, 21 July 2011 09:05 UTC

Return-Path: <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>
X-Original-To: ltru@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ltru@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06B1621F8B7C for <ltru@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Jul 2011 02:05:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -99.756
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-99.756 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.034, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_JP=1.244, HOST_EQ_JP=1.265, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tavtTcQwBXmK for <ltru@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Jul 2011 02:05:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from acintmta02.acbb.aoyama.ac.jp (acintmta02.acbb.aoyama.ac.jp [133.2.20.34]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF39421F8B11 for <ltru@ietf.org>; Thu, 21 Jul 2011 02:05:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from acmse02.acbb.aoyama.ac.jp ([133.2.20.226]) by acintmta02.acbb.aoyama.ac.jp (secret/secret) with SMTP id p6L95UF7009509 for <ltru@ietf.org>; Thu, 21 Jul 2011 18:05:30 +0900
Received: from (unknown [133.2.206.133]) by acmse02.acbb.aoyama.ac.jp with smtp id 3554_1525_95551cfe_b378_11e0_bcec_001d0969ab06; Thu, 21 Jul 2011 18:05:30 +0900
Received: from [IPv6:::1] ([133.2.210.5]:60203) by itmail.it.aoyama.ac.jp with [XMail 1.22 ESMTP Server] id <S1531927> for <ltru@ietf.org> from <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>; Thu, 21 Jul 2011 18:05:32 +0900
Message-ID: <4E27EBA8.7090605@it.aoyama.ac.jp>
Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2011 18:04:40 +0900
From: =?UTF-8?B?Ik1hcnRpbiBKLiBEw7xyc3Qi?= <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>
Organization: Aoyama Gakuin University
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100722 Eudora/3.0.4
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Phillips, Addison" <addison@lab126.com>
References: <SNT142-w18D0A48A7137C3535C2A5BB34A0@phx.gbl> <131F80DEA635F044946897AFDA9AC3476A946379CF@EX-SEA31-D.ant.amazon.com>
In-Reply-To: <131F80DEA635F044946897AFDA9AC3476A946379CF@EX-SEA31-D.ant.amazon.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Cc: CE Whitehead <cewcathar@hotmail.com>, "ltru@ietf.org" <ltru@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Ltru] Proposed -t0- subtag
X-BeenThere: ltru@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Language Tag Registry Update working group discussion list <ltru.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ltru>, <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ltru>
List-Post: <mailto:ltru@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru>, <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2011 09:05:39 -0000

On 2011/07/18 23:36, Phillips, Addison wrote:
> No. Mark is saying that we should publish the draft without a ‘t0’ “mechanism” subtag and then consider adding one later if there is need.

Would that be a new RFC for the -t extension, or an addition on the 
Unicode side?

Regards,   Martin.