[Ltru] Re: Remove extlang from ABNF?

Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr> Tue, 04 December 2007 11:29 UTC

Return-path: <ltru-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IzVyA-0004lb-Lv; Tue, 04 Dec 2007 06:29:42 -0500
Received: from ltru by megatron.ietf.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1IzVy9-0004kg-8L for ltru-confirm+ok@megatron.ietf.org; Tue, 04 Dec 2007 06:29:41 -0500
Received: from [10.90.34.44] (helo=chiedprmail1.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IzVy8-0004kY-UN for ltru@ietf.org; Tue, 04 Dec 2007 06:29:40 -0500
Received: from mx2.nic.fr ([192.134.4.11]) by chiedprmail1.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IzVy8-0002w2-Jt for ltru@ietf.org; Tue, 04 Dec 2007 06:29:40 -0500
Received: from mx2.nic.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx2.nic.fr (Postfix) with SMTP id 0C3E11C014C; Tue, 4 Dec 2007 12:29:40 +0100 (CET)
Received: from relay2.nic.fr (relay2.nic.fr [192.134.4.163]) by mx2.nic.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07A101C0148; Tue, 4 Dec 2007 12:29:40 +0100 (CET)
Received: from bortzmeyer.nic.fr (batilda.nic.fr [192.134.4.69]) by relay2.nic.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED52B58EB9B; Tue, 4 Dec 2007 12:29:39 +0100 (CET)
Date: Tue, 04 Dec 2007 12:29:39 +0100
From: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
To: Kent Karlsson <kent.karlsson14@comhem.se>
Message-ID: <20071204112939.GA13475@nic.fr>
References: <2721.218.110.62.118.1196732106.squirrel@webmail.w3.mag.keio.ac.jp> <014001c8365d$281607d0$4751f853@streamserve.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <014001c8365d$281607d0$4751f853@streamserve.com>
X-Operating-System: Debian GNU/Linux 4.0
X-Kernel: Linux 2.6.18-5-686 i686
Organization: NIC France
X-URL: http://www.nic.fr/
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11)
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 7a6398bf8aaeabc7a7bb696b6b0a2aad
Cc: 'LTRU Working Group' <ltru@ietf.org>
Subject: [Ltru] Re: Remove extlang from ABNF?
X-BeenThere: ltru@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Language Tag Registry Update working group discussion list <ltru.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru>, <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/ltru>
List-Post: <mailto:ltru@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru>, <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: ltru-bounces@ietf.org

On Tue, Dec 04, 2007 at 11:05:05AM +0100,
 Kent Karlsson <kent.karlsson14@comhem.se> wrote 
 a message of 28 lines which said:

> I, for one, don't mind keeping the extlang portions of the syntax,

I believe we must keep it, because we commited to stability. Once
well-formed, a tag should always be well-formed.

> It does not seem particularly harmful to keep it, even if never used
> for valid language tags.

+1 for me


_______________________________________________
Ltru mailing list
Ltru@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru