IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Ltru] Fw: I-D Action:draft-burnett-pronunciation-alphabet-registry-00.txt

Peter Constable <petercon@microsoft.com> Wed, 16 December 2009 09:00 UTC

Return-Path: <petercon@microsoft.com>
X-Original-To: ltru@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ltru@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA0FE3A697C for <ltru@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 Dec 2009 01:00:06 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LhMt1joJkGYc for <ltru@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 Dec 2009 01:00:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp.microsoft.com (mailb.microsoft.com [131.107.115.215]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 031A33A696C for <ltru@ietf.org>; Wed, 16 Dec 2009 01:00:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from TK5EX14HUBC103.redmond.corp.microsoft.com (157.54.86.9) by TK5-EXGWY-E802.partners.extranet.microsoft.com (10.251.56.168) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.2.176.0; Wed, 16 Dec 2009 01:00:22 -0800
Received: from TK5EX14MBXC141.redmond.corp.microsoft.com ([169.254.9.208]) by TK5EX14HUBC103.redmond.corp.microsoft.com ([157.54.86.9]) with mapi; Wed, 16 Dec 2009 00:59:51 -0800
From: Peter Constable <petercon@microsoft.com>
To: Randy Presuhn <randy_presuhn@mindspring.com>, LTRU Working Group <ltru@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Ltru] Fw: I-D Action:draft-burnett-pronunciation-alphabet-registry-00.txt
Thread-Index: AQHKfhs6Z3Na2FbcAkqDFVzdUSyl55FnX3nw
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 08:59:49 +0000
Message-ID: <BF2262AF099A70419F68A17FF6338DF40443A0F1@TK5EX14MBXC141.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
References: <012a01ca7c75$07aa4e60$6801a8c0@oemcomputer> <20091215210229.GA28404@mercury.ccil.org> <001d01ca7e1b$4a6796c0$6801a8c0@oemcomputer>
In-Reply-To: <001d01ca7e1b$4a6796c0$6801a8c0@oemcomputer>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [Ltru] Fw: I-D Action:draft-burnett-pronunciation-alphabet-registry-00.txt
X-BeenThere: ltru@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Language Tag Registry Update working group discussion list <ltru.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru>, <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ltru>
List-Post: <mailto:ltru@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru>, <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 09:00:06 -0000

From: ltru-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:ltru-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Randy Presuhn

> (FWIW, I don't see why a pronouncing alphavet would *necessarily* be a romanization system.)

Indeed: I met a Korean linguist about 10 years ago who was promoting use of Hangul for general phonetic transcription.



Peter

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email