IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Ltru] Re: Small bibliography error in RFC 4930

Frank Ellermann <nobody@xyzzy.claranet.de> Mon, 18 June 2007 09:07 UTC

Return-path: <ltru-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1I0DD4-0001C0-QU; Mon, 18 Jun 2007 05:07:42 -0400
Received: from ltru by megatron.ietf.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1I0DD3-0001As-47 for ltru-confirm+ok@megatron.ietf.org; Mon, 18 Jun 2007 05:07:41 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1I0DCy-00019A-Ru for ltru@lists.ietf.org; Mon, 18 Jun 2007 05:07:36 -0400
Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.229.2] helo=ciao.gmane.org) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1I0DCt-0001WN-3c for ltru@lists.ietf.org; Mon, 18 Jun 2007 05:07:36 -0400
Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1I0D3p-0004mV-Fw for ltru@lists.ietf.org; Mon, 18 Jun 2007 10:58:10 +0200
Received: from dialin-145-254-042-021.pools.arcor-ip.net ([145.254.42.21]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for <ltru@lists.ietf.org>; Mon, 18 Jun 2007 10:58:09 +0200
Received: from nobody by dialin-145-254-042-021.pools.arcor-ip.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for <ltru@lists.ietf.org>; Mon, 18 Jun 2007 10:58:09 +0200
X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/
To: ltru@lists.ietf.org
From: Frank Ellermann <nobody@xyzzy.claranet.de>
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2007 10:42:48 +0200
Organization: <URL:http://purl.net/xyzzy>
Lines: 21
Message-ID: <46764588.6AC6@xyzzy.claranet.de>
References: <046F43A8D79C794FA4733814869CDF0791702D@dul1wnexmb01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: dialin-145-254-042-021.pools.arcor-ip.net
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.0 (OS/2; U)
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 798b2e660f1819ae38035ac1d8d5e3ab
Cc: ietf-provreg@cafax.se
Subject: [Ltru] Re: Small bibliography error in RFC 4930
X-BeenThere: ltru@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Language Tag Registry Update working group discussion list <ltru.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru>, <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/ltru>
List-Post: <mailto:ltru@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru>, <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: ltru-bounces@ietf.org

Hollenbeck, Scott wrote:
 
> That's not an error. The references are correct as published for
> promotion to draft standard status.

At the moment you can reconstruct a 3066 registry by looking at
the redundant / grandfathered tags in the 4646 registry, and in
the source standards (i.e. the language and region subtags in the
4646 registry).

IOW just stay away from scripts, variants, and UN region numbers.

With the 4646bis registry it will be more convoluted, you'd also
have to stay away from 639-3 languages (+ extlangs, if any pop up).

Should 4646bis do something for protocols wishing to emulate the
old 3066 registry ?  We could flag the source of language tags in
the description field (just an idea).  Or add a how-to as appendix.

Frank




_______________________________________________
Ltru mailing list
Ltru@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru

v2.39.1 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status