Re: [Ltru] Re: UTF-8

Martin Duerst <duerst at it dot aoyama dot ac dot jp> wrote:

>> At the very least, there would have to be an AUTH48-like period where 
>> we could review the end product and make corrections before it was 
>> publicly posted on IANA's site.
>
> We got that last time round, so I don't see a problem here.

I got an AUTH48 for RFC 4645, but that was after the Registry contents 
were stripped out.  I'm talking about the actual contents of the 
Registry submitted to IANA.  So far there have been three errors in 
versions posted by IANA after adding incremental updates.  If IANA needs 
to do any sort of processing at all, there should be a way for the 
Reviewer (or his proxy :) to review the finished product before it is 
posted publicly.

--
Doug Ewell
Fullerton, California, USA
http://users.adelphia.net/~dewell/
RFC 4645  *  UTN #14

_______________________________________________
Ltru mailing list
Ltru@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru