Re: [Ltru] ar and other Macrolanguages (was: Re: Macrolanguage, Extlang. The Sami language situation as example)

"Andrew Cunningham" <lang.support@gmail.com> Fri, 30 May 2008 12:06 UTC

Return-Path: <ltru-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ltru-archive@megatron.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-ltru-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BE723A6828; Fri, 30 May 2008 05:06:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: ltru@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ltru@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82F553A67CC for <ltru@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 30 May 2008 05:06:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zOP8NvKvo8MQ for <ltru@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 30 May 2008 05:06:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from yx-out-2324.google.com (yx-out-2324.google.com [74.125.44.29]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0A7C3A698A for <ltru@ietf.org>; Fri, 30 May 2008 05:05:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by yx-out-2324.google.com with SMTP id 8so405203yxg.49 for <ltru@ietf.org>; Fri, 30 May 2008 05:05:13 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=Sx3wvE5uWMes/Oo/ZVRRFO6m2RgKEJj5RuntLKBvVao=; b=Pzq4U3Y/UNWTF8nzZLlA9ZA4q1LYDsJLvkBUFZ+UM53/vC7xdnEr3XMkMc/oXTdmG8hwY2QYgrL6DePSyc0/3PQh2/0TB/Z9SHTxphenuN87dbgPkGwmHFUaq6QzukBCPmEo88h775fhooH0uqVY3Ch4pzh4wM+DRep4WfsjIVE=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=q/xAsQjzujyzCgbH7wRK0yjaOItALB4ZtKuHKxNwtdt+ysR6CeOUw9H/lDMz2zm3ODMxTsan8ZNZEt90wtZBTnj6QFWdWHTCawIOqpsGa4xNhdj2gnXpQMzBZ9wV+a46Qvo36Yq5lynRKqquHoJr5bF2CQppHnmpNoGL8XSEAt4=
Received: by 10.151.42.21 with SMTP id u21mr922454ybj.211.1212149113189; Fri, 30 May 2008 05:05:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.151.42.12 with HTTP; Fri, 30 May 2008 05:05:13 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <9d70cb000805300505v2464ca1csadda650354936952@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 30 May 2008 22:05:13 +1000
From: Andrew Cunningham <lang.support@gmail.com>
To: ltru@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <6.0.0.20.2.20080530172147.0824a2c0@localhost>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <mailman.636.1211925384.15310.ltru@ietf.org> <001501c8c121$646ebe80$e6f5e547@DGBP7M81> <483E14ED.6030100@malform.no> <002601c8c13e$60217e40$e6f5e547@DGBP7M81> <483E3D68.1080202@malform.no> <004901c8c155$419bf560$e6f5e547@DGBP7M81> <4D25F22093241741BC1D0EEBC2DBB1DA013A84C39D@EX-SEA5-D.ant.amazon.com> <483EFFDA.7020401@malform.no> <DDB6DE6E9D27DD478AE6D1BBBB835795633304EB66@NA-EXMSG-C117.redmond.corp.microsoft.com> <6.0.0.20.2.20080530172147.0824a2c0@localhost>
Subject: Re: [Ltru] ar and other Macrolanguages (was: Re: Macrolanguage, Extlang. The Sami language situation as example)
X-BeenThere: ltru@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Language Tag Registry Update working group discussion list <ltru.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru>, <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/ltru>
List-Post: <mailto:ltru@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru>, <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: ltru-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ltru-bounces@ietf.org

Hi all,

2008/5/30 Martin Duerst <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>:


> So based on the above analysis, when it comes to ar- for Arabic,
> count me in.
>

except there are cases when this will get messy.

the best example of problems with Arabic as a macrolanguage is pga
Sudanese Creole Arabic (Juba Arabic), a creole assigned to the Arabic
macrolanguage. One key difference between Juba Arabic and all other
languages belonging to the Arabic macrolanguage (other than the fact
it is a creole) is the question of default writing script. Most
publications in Juba Arabic are written in the Latin script rather
than the Arabic script.

>
>>- Don Osborne has several times over the past couple of years mentioned
>>interest in the macrolanguage concept wrt African languages because of
>>(IIUC) trends toward evolution of varieties used for wider communication.
>>But it's not clear to me that macrolanguage is the appropriate concept
>>there, as opposed to a distinct, individual language, and even if these are
>>considered macrolanguages I don't see requests to have extlang for these
>>cases: if anything, the emerging variety used in wider communication makes
>>the local varieties *less* relevant for tagging purposes, not more.
>
> Well, yes, the emerging variety may make the local varieties less
> important, but are we not already at exactly this situation for
> Chinese and Arabic? For me, the concern here is much more that
> these are currently very fluid situations, and whether extlangs
> or not, we are not really good at dealing with fluid situations.
>

fluidity is a problem

we are already noticing it with Dinka documents, where traditionally
documents were written for a specific dialect and one fo the five
ISO-639-3 language codes would be most appropriate, but somre of the
documents being produced for educational purposes by Dinka expats
would be more suitably identified with the ISO-639-2 code since the
documents aren't written in a specific dialect, but rather in an
emerging Dinka influenced by each of the dialects.



-- 
Andrew Cunningham
Vicnet Research and Development Coordinator
State Library of Victoria
Australia

andrewc@vicnet.net.au
lang.support@gmail.com
_______________________________________________
Ltru mailing list
Ltru@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru