RE: [Ltru] Re: Small bibliography error in RFC 4930

Stephane wrote:

> It is difficult even for the IETF to keep track of its own 
> standards :-(

I agree.  I have had many difficulties with this.  I think it would be a
good idea if every time an RFC is made obsolete by the publishing of a new
RFC that the new RFC reference is added to the old RFC - preferably on the
first page under "Obsoletes:". Add a new line "Obsoleted by/date:" ? How
could this best be achieved across the IETF? 

Debbie

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Stephane Bortzmeyer [mailto:bortzmeyer@nic.fr] 
> Sent: 17 June 2007 21:00
> To: ltru@lists.ietf.org
> Subject: [Ltru] Re: Small bibliography error in RFC 4930
> 
> On Sun, Jun 17, 2007 at 09:26:52PM +0200,  Stephane 
> Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr> wrote  a message of 27 lines 
> which said:
> 
> > RFC 4930 has several normative references to RFC 3066.
> ...
> > RFC 3066 have been obsoleted by RFC 4646 in September 2006, several 
> > months before.
> 
> It is difficult even for the IETF to keep track of its own 
> standards :-(
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Ltru mailing list
> Ltru@ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru
> 
> 

_______________________________________________
Ltru mailing list
Ltru@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru