Moving forward (Was: [Ltru] matching draft, issue 50)

[co-chair hat (or actually, shepherd hat) on]

The IETF Last Call has ended. I'd like to move forward, at least
with issues that seem to have reached consensus (mostly by nobody
bringing up any opposing views, which is fine for the minor
editorial issues that we are dealing with at the moment).

The reply from John below is the only reply on issue 50 that I have
seen on the list.

Absent sudden disagreement, I would like to instruct the editors
to prepare a new version of the draft with variant C for the Abstract,
as well as with the other edits as described in
http://www1.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ltru/current/msg04979.html,
and a diff to the -14 version.

Regards,     Martin.

At 22:53 06/06/16, John Cowan wrote:
>Martin Duerst scripsit:
>
>> BTW, as a technical contributor, my preference is C before D before
>> B before A.
>
>+1
>
>-- 
>John Cowan      cowan@ccil.org        http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
>        Is it not written, "That which is written, is written"?

#-#-#  Martin J. Du"rst, Assoc. Professor, Aoyama Gakuin University
#-#-#  http://www.sw.it.aoyama.ac.jp       mailto:duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp     

_______________________________________________
Ltru mailing list
Ltru@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru