[Ltru] Re: Remove extlang from ABNF?

Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr> Tue, 04 December 2007 16:45 UTC

Return-path: <ltru-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IzatS-0000kn-GY; Tue, 04 Dec 2007 11:45:10 -0500
Received: from ltru by megatron.ietf.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1IzatR-0000k3-De for ltru-confirm+ok@megatron.ietf.org; Tue, 04 Dec 2007 11:45:09 -0500
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IzatR-0000iR-3Z for ltru@lists.ietf.org; Tue, 04 Dec 2007 11:45:09 -0500
Received: from mx2.nic.fr ([192.134.4.11]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IzatQ-0004yk-R1 for ltru@lists.ietf.org; Tue, 04 Dec 2007 11:45:09 -0500
Received: from mx2.nic.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx2.nic.fr (Postfix) with SMTP id 56FE21C017B; Tue, 4 Dec 2007 17:45:08 +0100 (CET)
Received: from relay2.nic.fr (relay2.nic.fr [192.134.4.163]) by mx2.nic.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 524091C0135; Tue, 4 Dec 2007 17:45:08 +0100 (CET)
Received: from bortzmeyer.nic.fr (batilda.nic.fr [192.134.4.69]) by relay2.nic.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4541C58ECBE; Tue, 4 Dec 2007 17:45:08 +0100 (CET)
Date: Tue, 04 Dec 2007 17:45:08 +0100
From: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
To: Frank Ellermann <hmdmhdfmhdjmzdtjmzdtzktdkztdjz@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20071204164508.GA24641@nic.fr>
References: <20071204112939.GA13475@nic.fr> <fj3lel$isq$1@ger.gmane.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <fj3lel$isq$1@ger.gmane.org>
X-Operating-System: Debian GNU/Linux 4.0
X-Kernel: Linux 2.6.18-5-686 i686
Organization: NIC France
X-URL: http://www.nic.fr/
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11)
X-Spam-Score: -4.0 (----)
X-Scan-Signature: cf4fa59384e76e63313391b70cd0dd25
Cc: ltru@lists.ietf.org
Subject: [Ltru] Re: Remove extlang from ABNF?
X-BeenThere: ltru@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Language Tag Registry Update working group discussion list <ltru.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru>, <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/ltru>
List-Post: <mailto:ltru@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru>, <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: ltru-bounces@ietf.org

On Tue, Dec 04, 2007 at 02:38:07PM +0100,
 Frank Ellermann <nobody@xyzzy.claranet.de> wrote 
 a message of 8 lines which said:

> > Once well-formed, a tag should always be well-formed.
> 
> There are no extlang tags yet, well-formed or otherwise.

Are you sure? Did you read every XML document published to check the
language tag they indicate? It is *probably* true but I find
nevertheless annoying that we change the syntax in a way that will
make well-formed tags illegal. It will be difficult to claim that we
place stability over everything after that.





_______________________________________________
Ltru mailing list
Ltru@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru