RE: [Ltru] Punjabi
"Don Osborn" <dzo@bisharat.net> Tue, 13 March 2007 19:56 UTC
Return-path: <ltru-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HRD6X-0004pH-U8; Tue, 13 Mar 2007 15:56:17 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HRD6W-0004pC-Iy for ltru@ietf.org; Tue, 13 Mar 2007 15:56:16 -0400
Received: from 113166.kabissa.org ([72.32.199.201]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HRD6Q-0005vh-DU for ltru@ietf.org; Tue, 13 Mar 2007 15:56:16 -0400
Received: (qmail 8855 invoked from network); 13 Mar 2007 14:55:16 -0500
Received: from pool-72-75-17-82.washdc.east.verizon.net (HELO IBM92AA25595C4) (72.75.17.82) by 72.32.229.137 with SMTP; 13 Mar 2007 14:55:15 -0500
From: Don Osborn <dzo@bisharat.net>
To: 'Mark Davis' <mark.davis@icu-project.org>, 'LTRU Working Group' <ltru@ietf.org>, ISO639-3@sil.org, iso639-2@loc.gov
References: <30b660a20703131211r20b4ee68ja6e7670b74e65c4c@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <30b660a20703131211r20b4ee68ja6e7670b74e65c4c@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: RE: [Ltru] Punjabi
Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2007 15:55:04 -0400
Message-ID: <008101c765a9$7f4d01a0$7de704e0$@net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0
Thread-Index: Acdlo4R5+vCaS32kROuxMUTBiJJLbgAA3xow
Content-Language: en-us
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: cdb443e3957ca9b4c5b55e78cfcf4b26
Cc: "'Sarmad Hussain, Dr.'" <sarmad.hussain@nu.edu.pk>
X-BeenThere: ltru@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Language Tag Registry Update working group discussion list <ltru.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru>, <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/ltru>
List-Post: <mailto:ltru@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru>, <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1632372693=="
Errors-To: ltru-bounces@ietf.org
Hi Mark. An addendum to your question would be what they write. Might there be a pa-PK written standard? I don’t know, just asking. I will take the liberty of cc’ing the question to Dr. Sarmad Hussein of the National University of Computer and Emerging Sciences in Lahore, who also heads the PAN L10n project in Asia ( http://www.panl10n.net ), in case he has any thoughts. Don From: Mark Davis [mailto:mark.davis@icu-project.org] Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2007 3:12 PM To: LTRU Working Group; ISO639-3@sil.org; iso639-2@loc.gov Subject: [Ltru] Punjabi I have a question about Punjabi. ISO 639-2 gives "pan" as Punjabi. ISO 639-3 divides Punjabi into three separate codes: pmu Mirpur Panjabi pnb Western Panjabi pan Panjabi // called Eastern Panjabi in the Ethnologue. It looks from this that according to ISO 639-3, there is no macro language for Panjabi; Pakistanis don't speak "pan" (= "pa"), even as a macro language they speak something else. So a language pa-PK (or locale pa_PK) is probably a mistake. Is this a fair statement? -- Mark
_______________________________________________ Ltru mailing list Ltru@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru
- [Ltru] Punjabi Mark Davis
- RE: [Ltru] Punjabi Don Osborn
- RE: [Ltru] Punjabi Peter Constable
- Re: [Ltru] Punjabi Mark Davis
- Re: [Ltru] Punjabi John Cowan
- RE: [Ltru] Punjabi Peter Constable
- [Ltru] Re: Punjabi Doug Ewell
- RE: [Ltru] Re: Punjabi Peter Constable
- [Ltru] Re: [everson@evertype.com: The Language Su… Doug Ewell
- RE: [Ltru] Punjabi Don Osborn
- Re: [Ltru] Re: [everson@evertype.com: The Languag… Addison Phillips
- Re: [Ltru] Punjabi Mark Davis
- RE: [Ltru] Punjabi Peter Constable
- RE: [Ltru] Punjabi Sukhjinder Sidhu
- RE: [Ltru] Punjabi Sarmad Hussain, Dr.
- Re: [Ltru] Punjabi John Cowan
- Re: [Ltru] Punjabi sukhjinder_sidhu
- Re: [Ltru] Punjabi sukhjinder_sidhu
- Re: [Ltru] Punjabi sukhjinder_sidhu
- Fwd: [Ltru] Punjabi Mark Davis
- [Ltru] Re: Punjabi Doug Ewell
- [Ltru] Punjabi Abbas Malik
- [Ltru] Re: Punjabi John Cowan
- [Ltru] extlang (was: Punjabi) Frank Ellermann
- Re: [Ltru] Punjabi Mark Davis
- Re: [Ltru] Punjabi sukhjinder_sidhu
- Re: [Ltru] Re: Punjabi Mark Davis
- Re: [Ltru] Re: Punjabi John Cowan
- Re: [Ltru] Re: Punjabi Mark Davis
- Re: [Ltru] Re: Punjabi Addison Phillips
- Re: [Ltru] Re: Punjabi Mark Davis
- Re: [Ltru] Re: Punjabi Addison Phillips
- RE: [Ltru] Re: Punjabi Don Osborn
- Re: [Ltru] Re: Punjabi Mark Davis
- RE: [Ltru] Re: Punjabi Peter Constable
- [Ltru] Re: Punjabi Doug Ewell
- Re: [Ltru] Re: Punjabi Doug Ewell
- Re: [Ltru] Re: Punjabi Doug Ewell
- RE: [Ltru] extlang (was: Punjabi) Don Osborn
- [Ltru] Re: extlang Frank Ellermann
- Re: [Ltru] Re: extlang Mark Davis
- RE: [Ltru] Re: extlang Don Osborn
- Re: [Ltru] Re: extlang Addison Phillips
- Re: [Ltru] Re: extlang Mark Davis
- Re: [Ltru] Re: extlang John Cowan
- Re: [Ltru] Re: extlang Addison Phillips
- RE: [Ltru] Re: extlang Don Osborn
- Re: [Ltru] Re: extlang GerardM
- RE: [Ltru] Re: extlang Don Osborn
- [Ltru] Re: extlang Stephane Bortzmeyer
- RE: [Ltru] Re: extlang Peter Constable
- Re: [Ltru] Re: extlang Marion Gunn
- RE: [Ltru] Re: extlang Peter Constable
- Re: [Ltru] Re: extlang Addison Phillips
- VS: [Ltru] Re: extlang Erkki I. Kolehmainen
- RE: [Ltru] Re: extlang Don Osborn
- Re: [Ltru] Re: extlang Mark Davis
- Re: [Ltru] Re: extlang John Cowan
- Re: [Ltru] Re: extlang Addison Phillips