Re: [Ltru] clear guidance on tagging in cases involving a related macrolanguage

Broome, Karen さんは書きました:
> I think extlang will likely be a cleaner solution to me than what you might offer, but I'm open to that as long as the preferred tagging and associated semantics are clear.
>   

this sounds like your vote

1: C
2: A

could also be

1: B (if there is a clear guidance on tagging in cases involving a related
macrolanguage available)
2: A

but given the long discussion about sec. 
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-ltru-4646bis-14#section-4.1.1
it seems difficult to formulate that guidance.

Felix

> I think de-CH is a problem. I see more problems like this if we move forward extlangless with multiple "preferred" tag choices for the same thing and subjective distinctions. In the face of that, I start to like ISO 639-6.
>
> I *like* hierarchies.
>
> Karen
>
> ________________________________________
> From: Peter Constable [petercon@microsoft.com]
> Sent: Thursday, May 22, 2008 6:40 PM
> To: Broome, Karen
> Cc: LTRU Working Group
> Subject: RE: clear guidance on tagging in cases involving a related     macrolanguage
>
> Could you live without extlang provided those conditions were met, or do you think those conditions can't be met without extlang?
>
>
> Peter
>
>   
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Broome, Karen [mailto:Karen_Broome@spe.sony.com]
>> Sent: Thursday, May 22, 2008 5:01 PM
>> To: Peter Constable
>> Cc: LTRU Working Group
>> Subject: RE: clear guidance on tagging in cases involving a related
>> macrolanguage
>>
>> Yes, Peter.
>>
>>     
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: ltru-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:ltru-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf
>>> Of Peter Constable
>>> Sent: Thursday, May 22, 2008 4:58 PM
>>> To: LTRU Working Group
>>> Subject: [Ltru] clear guidance on tagging in cases involving a
>>> related macrolanguage
>>>
>>> [changing the subject per Randy's request]
>>>
>>>       
>>>> From: Broome, Karen [mailto:Karen_Broome@spe.sony.com]
>>>>         
>>>> Either way, zh-yue will remain valid, but not necessarily
>>>>         
>>> preferred.
>>>       
>>>> Having clear preferences is very important to me. I really don't
>>>>         
>>> want
>>>       
>>>> to recommend that people use "zh" for Mandarin or have to explain
>>>>         
>>> to
>>>       
>>>> someone why I think a deprecated tag is preferred in this industry
>>>>         
>>> but
>>>       
>>>> not others.
>>>>         
>>> And in another msg,
>>>
>>>       
>>>> I care more about identification than applications.
>>>>         
>>> So, it sounds to me like what you really care about are the
>>> following:
>>>
>>> - Don't have a recommendation "tag Madarin content as zh"
>>>
>>> - Have a single clear recommendation for how to tag each language
>>> (one or the other of "cmn" or "zh-cmn" for Mandarin would do).
>>>
>>>
>>> Is that right?
>>>
>>>
>>> Peter
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Ltru mailing list
>>> Ltru@ietf.org
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru
>>>       
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ltru mailing list
> Ltru@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru
>   

_______________________________________________
Ltru mailing list
Ltru@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru