IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Ltru] Consensus call: extlang

"Andrew Cunningham" <lang.support@gmail.com> Fri, 30 May 2008 06:28 UTC

Return-Path: <ltru-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ltru-archive@megatron.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-ltru-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF34428C186; Thu, 29 May 2008 23:28:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: ltru@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ltru@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CF4428C192 for <ltru@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 May 2008 23:28:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lK+9Vu2SRo-A for <ltru@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 May 2008 23:28:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from yw-out-2324.google.com (yw-out-2324.google.com [74.125.46.31]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C9C528C170 for <ltru@ietf.org>; Thu, 29 May 2008 23:28:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by yw-out-2324.google.com with SMTP id 3so2054747ywj.49 for <ltru@ietf.org>; Thu, 29 May 2008 23:28:53 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=URNPM8USC81ZK6Tgrg3Geyap2DvOevk8Loh3ObIPAVc=; b=PBt18zysnbZ1lZcT/qEVI1U21Ewi2/Yu/LQhzALd3RqQxSBjxmcwxrUM4XN6/NdAMQRPL5TwD4eAgGFh8hY7XPhcmUnjKBT92IIl7fon56JplRAVVD7QihsctGKiNXtHnwuyyswYNro6wwSks7SN/kF8Oc2gWSoqf/4T+VeV/to=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=c+dhC3SMSr5uniFYnO4eKjO4SALdaO5Icf/szFuO3sD/FC+iM25MdXmkbeDmLtz2D8WM26W3EYhcAApArbVjSc3lboYuH7k5bnTOkyxdMzwz1kz0M8NVCtvij1qH6VJJWxbeYI957RFmYxvfHf5oUba2luAlDjVYUgTPqlnywyY=
Received: by 10.151.113.5 with SMTP id q5mr9495645ybm.135.1212128933351; Thu, 29 May 2008 23:28:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.151.42.12 with HTTP; Thu, 29 May 2008 23:28:53 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <9d70cb000805292328j36983ffcqcd744d2aa54215b@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 30 May 2008 16:28:53 +1000
From: Andrew Cunningham <lang.support@gmail.com>
To: LTRU Working Group <ltru@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <E19FDBD7A3A7F04788F00E90915BD36C13C251B4FC@USSDIXMSG20.spe.sony.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <01c301c8bbe5$8c2810c0$6801a8c0@oemcomputer> <6.0.0.20.2.20080527170755.05bd89c0@localhost> <002f01c8c024$0dcdb5c0$6801a8c0@oemcomputer> <6.0.0.20.2.20080528163346.074fac80@localhost> <001f01c8c122$0cbcae80$6801a8c0@oemcomputer> <4D25F22093241741BC1D0EEBC2DBB1DA013A84C314@EX-SEA5-D.ant.amazon.com> <007601c8c1bc$84d93920$6801a8c0@oemcomputer> <104f01c8c1d8$94ad6f30$0a00a8c0@CPQ86763045110> <30b660a20805291559x4f6243a8pecc7ee92c2a36d9c@mail.gmail.com> <E19FDBD7A3A7F04788F00E90915BD36C13C251B4FC@USSDIXMSG20.spe.sony.com>
Subject: Re: [Ltru] Consensus call: extlang
X-BeenThere: ltru@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Language Tag Registry Update working group discussion list <ltru.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru>, <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/ltru>
List-Post: <mailto:ltru@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru>, <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: ltru-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ltru-bounces@ietf.org

2008/5/30 Broome, Karen <Karen_Broome@spe.sony.com>:

> Chinese (Variant Unknown)
> Chinese (Cantonese, Spoken)
> Chinese (Cantonese, Written)
> Chinese (Mandarin, Spoken)
> Chinese (Mandarin, Spoken Taiwanese)
> Chinese (Mandarin, Simplified)
> Chinese (Mandarin, Traditional)
> Chinese (Taiwanese, Spoken)
> Chinese (Taiwanese, Written)
>


wouldn't Chinese (Cantonese, Written) be divided into

Chinese (Cantonese, Simplified)  and  Chinese (Cantonese, Traditional)

I'm assuming a citizen of Guangzhou province, if they decide to write
in Cantonese, are unlikely to be doing so in Traditional characters.
Although my assumptions may be wrong.

-- 
Andrew Cunningham
Vicnet Research and Development Coordinator
State Library of Victoria
Australia

andrewc@vicnet.net.au
lang.support@gmail.com
_______________________________________________
Ltru mailing list
Ltru@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email