IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Ltru] Consensus call: extlang

"Broome, Karen" <Karen_Broome@spe.sony.com> Thu, 22 May 2008 23:32 UTC

Return-Path: <ltru-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ltru-archive@megatron.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-ltru-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07AC93A6B48; Thu, 22 May 2008 16:32:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: ltru@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ltru@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31FA128C1B8 for <ltru@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 22 May 2008 16:32:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8PaqNlS0JiHL for <ltru@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 22 May 2008 16:32:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from outbound10-sin-R.bigfish.com (outbound-sin.frontbridge.com [207.46.51.80]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 807BA3A6969 for <ltru@ietf.org>; Thu, 22 May 2008 16:32:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from outbound10-sin.bigfish.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by outbound10-sin-R.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DB6A1852A77 for <ltru@ietf.org>; Thu, 22 May 2008 23:32:00 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail153-sin-R.bigfish.com (unknown [10.3.40.3]) by outbound10-sin.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 248CB198004C for <ltru@ietf.org>; Thu, 22 May 2008 23:32:00 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail153-sin (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail153-sin-R.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 172F0166012D for <ltru@ietf.org>; Thu, 22 May 2008 23:32:00 +0000 (UTC)
X-BigFish: V
X-MS-Exchange-Organization-Antispam-Report: OrigIP: 160.33.98.75;Service: EHS
Received: by mail153-sin (MessageSwitch) id 121149912080226_14761; Thu, 22 May 2008 23:32:00 +0000 (UCT)
Received: from mail8.fw-bc.sony.com (mail8.fw-bc.sony.com [160.33.98.75]) by mail153-sin.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73805F4005A for <ltru@ietf.org>; Thu, 22 May 2008 23:31:59 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail1.sgo.in.sel.sony.com (mail1.sgo.in.sel.sony.com [43.130.1.111]) by mail8.fw-bc.sony.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id m4MNVuMi023249 for <ltru@ietf.org>; Thu, 22 May 2008 23:31:56 GMT
Received: from ussdixhub21.spe.sony.com ([43.130.141.76]) by mail1.sgo.in.sel.sony.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id m4MNVuNT019898 for <ltru@ietf.org>; Thu, 22 May 2008 23:31:56 GMT
Received: from USSDIXMSG20.spe.sony.com ([43.130.141.74]) by ussdixhub21.spe.sony.com ([43.130.141.76]) with mapi; Thu, 22 May 2008 16:31:56 -0700
From: "Broome, Karen" <Karen_Broome@spe.sony.com>
To: LTRU Working Group <ltru@ietf.org>
Date: Thu, 22 May 2008 16:31:54 -0700
Thread-Topic: [Ltru] Consensus call: extlang
Thread-Index: Aci8YLR2WZkhPo4MS1+nx9v4VTM3rQAAyOsA
Message-ID: <E19FDBD7A3A7F04788F00E90915BD36C13C251B157@USSDIXMSG20.spe.sony.com>
References: <01c301c8bbe5$8c2810c0$6801a8c0@oemcomputer> <30b660a20805221029k13cdb18asf31bcb6f9fc491a1@mail.gmail.com> <DDB6DE6E9D27DD478AE6D1BBBB83579562E2683F73@NA-EXMSG-C117.redmond.corp.microsoft.com> <C9BF0238EED3634BA1866AEF14C7A9E56157008C2B@NA-EXMSG-C116.redmond.corp.microsoft.com> <DDB6DE6E9D27DD478AE6D1BBBB83579562E2683FA7@NA-EXMSG-C117.redmond.corp.microsoft.com> <C9BF0238EED3634BA1866AEF14C7A9E56157008C4B@NA-EXMSG-C116.redmond.corp.microsoft.com> <E19FDBD7A3A7F04788F00E90915BD36C13C251B147@USSDIXMSG20.spe.sony.com> <30b660a20805221608s7f5b5888ie0230078065ad650@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <30b660a20805221608s7f5b5888ie0230078065ad650@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [Ltru] Consensus call: extlang
X-BeenThere: ltru@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Language Tag Registry Update working group discussion list <ltru.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru>, <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/ltru>
List-Post: <mailto:ltru@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru>, <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: ltru-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ltru-bounces@ietf.org

I care more about identification than applications. - K.

Mark wrote:

I haven't looked at the exact language around this that we have already, but I think we should clearly state (if we don't already) that for any cases where we have such equivalences, implementations SHOULD treat them as the same on input. (They may do this by internally converting one way or the other, but that's not our business.)

Mark

_______________________________________________
Ltru mailing list
Ltru@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email