IETF Logo Mail Archive

RE: [Ltru] Charter Discussion

"Peter Constable" <petercon@microsoft.com> Thu, 22 June 2006 18:10 UTC

Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FtTdc-0000G6-5Y; Thu, 22 Jun 2006 14:10:44 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FtTdb-0000Ff-3h for ltru@ietf.org; Thu, 22 Jun 2006 14:10:43 -0400
Received: from maila.microsoft.com ([131.107.1.6] helo=mail1.microsoft.com) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FtTdZ-0004ka-Qp for ltru@ietf.org; Thu, 22 Jun 2006 14:10:43 -0400
Received: from mailout6.microsoft.com ([157.54.69.150]) by mail1.microsoft.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Thu, 22 Jun 2006 11:10:41 -0700
Received: from RED-MSG-52.redmond.corp.microsoft.com ([157.54.61.146]) by mailout6.microsoft.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Thu, 22 Jun 2006 11:10:41 -0700
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: RE: [Ltru] Charter Discussion
Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2006 11:10:09 -0700
Message-ID: <F8ACB1B494D9734783AAB114D0CE68FE0A1C6A9B@RED-MSG-52.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
In-Reply-To: <005201c69620$e4384290$040aa8c0@DGBP7M81>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: [Ltru] Charter Discussion
Thread-Index: AcaWIO/734fjEDGBR4aoUJedHIxSFAABeSQA
From: Peter Constable <petercon@microsoft.com>
To: LTRU Working Group <ltru@ietf.org>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 22 Jun 2006 18:10:41.0046 (UTC) FILETIME=[2BDD6B60:01C69627]
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 68c8cc8a64a9d0402e43b8eee9fc4199
X-BeenThere: ltru@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Language Tag Registry Update working group discussion list <ltru.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru>, <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/ltru>
List-Post: <mailto:ltru@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru>, <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1315676301=="
Errors-To: ltru-bounces@ietf.org

> From: Doug Ewell [mailto:dewell@adelphia.net]
> Sent: Thursday, June 22, 2006 10:26 AM


> I think the "current debate over certain details" is a sign that it
> might be worthwhile to define the conceptual model more clearly.  There
> is a significant disparity between list members' views of the purpose of
> the Description field...

> At the very least, even if we decide not to adopt ISO 11179 principles,
> we should answer this particular question more definitively.

Sure. But I don't think implementing ISO 11179 is particularly going to help us determine what the purpose of the Description field is. 



Peter Constable

_______________________________________________
Ltru mailing list
Ltru@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru

v2.26.15 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status