Re: [Ltru] Re: UTF-8

At 01:52 06/09/18, Doug Ewell wrote:
>Martin Duerst <duerst at it dot aoyama dot ac dot jp> wrote:
>
>>> John's "net-UTF-8" draft isn't ready, and I had some troubles to understand his last published version.
>>
>> That isn't very relevant, except that it suggests normalization to NFC, which I assume we would do anyway, and which is already an issue in the case of NCRs.
>
>Both the current Registry and the prototype 4646bis version are in NFC. Frankly, it hadn't occurred to me to do it any other way.
>
>This raises an interesting subpoint:  I suppose either 4646bis or 4645bis should state explicitly that the Registry is in NFC.

I agree. Frank said we should just use what the source uses,
but officially, the soure in most cases still is paper.

Regards,    Martin.

#-#-#  Martin J. Du"rst, Assoc. Professor, Aoyama Gakuin University
#-#-#  http://www.sw.it.aoyama.ac.jp       mailto:duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp     

_______________________________________________
Ltru mailing list
Ltru@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru